|
4. CORREISPONDENCE (Cont'd
<br />d. HUD Area Office'letter'dated August 19; 1976: This letter is FINAL
<br />from Mr. Stephen J. Havens, Director, Community Planning and INSPECTION
<br />Development Division, acknowledging receipt of the Contractor's SCHEDULED,
<br />Certificate and Completion Affidavit for Contract 2, Phase III, 9 -1 -76,
<br />Pedestrian Way, that we submitted with our letter dated August CONTRACT 2,
<br />, 1976. PHASE III,
<br />& DREDGING
<br />Final inspection of this Contract and the Colfax Pier /Park CONTRACT,
<br />Dredging Contract is tentatively scheduled for September 1, R -66
<br />1976.
<br />Motio was made by Mr. Wiggins, seconded by Mr. Cira and carried,
<br />that he above communications be received and placed on file.
<br />5. OLD BUSINESS
<br />a. Change Order No. 6 to Rehabilitation Contract No. SECD /HR /CS- CHANGE ORDER
<br />1/07: This item was tabled from the last Commission meeting NO. 6 TO
<br />in which the change order request was for an increase in CONTRACT
<br />ontract amount of $1,796.00, with the Slatile Roofing & SECD /HR /CS-
<br />heet Metal Company, at 502 Sherman Avenue, for an amended 1/07 APPROVED,
<br />ontract total of $5,812.00 for Contract No. 7, and original SECD HOUSING
<br />ontract set total of $40,246.00 to be amended to: $42,042.00, PROGRAM
<br />in the Southeast Community Development Housing Program.
<br />he new Change Order No. 6, submitted for this Commission meet -
<br />ng along with the memorandum from Mr. Ken Schaller, Project
<br />irector, is for an increase in contract amount of $1,066.00,
<br />Contract $4,016.00 to amended amount of: $5,082.0.0, for Con -
<br />ract No. 7), with original contract set total of $40,246.00
<br />o be amended to: $41,312.00, with an extension of contract
<br />ime for this portion of the work.
<br />r. Schaller was requested to explain the reduction, and he
<br />tated that, basically, the difference in price was the result
<br />f a different type of roofing to be installed on the rear of
<br />he structure. The contract had originally called for a 4 -ply
<br />tandard built -up roof. However, after re- visiting the struc-
<br />ure and discussing the situation with the contractor, we
<br />ound that we can have a 90# rolled roofing installed at a
<br />avings of $730.00 and not sacrifice a quality roof installa-
<br />ion. Mr. Schaller had photographs of the structure which he
<br />istributed to the Commissioners.
<br />n reference to the questions asked by Commissioner Wiggins
<br />n the roof, Mr. Schaller advised the rear portion of the
<br />tructure would be reroofed with the 90# rolled roofing, and
<br />hat the main roof would be 3 -in -1 asphalt shingles. They pre -
<br />ently have T -lock shingles and they are starting to deteriorate
<br />n the house.
<br />r. Wiggins moved for the approval of Change Order No. 6, for
<br />n increase in contract amount of $1,066.00, with Slatile Roofing
<br />
|