Laserfiche WebLink
6. NEW <br />INESS (Cont'd <br />f. C )ntract #SECD /30, #SECD /31, # SECD /32 and #SECD35' Southeast <br />C )mmunity Develo ment Program: Per recommendations of the <br />S utheast Advisory Committee, Commission approval was requested <br />t approve the bids for contract award to Slatile Roofing & Sheet <br />I tal Company, subject to Common Council and Legal Counsel approval, <br />i the Southeast Community Development Program. This item is part <br />of the bid tabulation, as shown above in Item 6e. The only bids <br />ceived for these contracts are: <br />C <br />e <br />b <br />e <br />h <br />I� <br />ntract <br />Slatile Roofing & <br />umber <br />Address <br />Sheet `Metal Co. <br />30 <br />313 <br />East Calvert Street <br />$ 5,667.00 <br />31 <br />630 <br />East Dayton Street <br />6,245.00 <br />32 <br />719 <br />East Haney Street <br />5,815.00 <br />35 <br />911 <br />Marietta Street <br />6,487.00 <br />CONTRACTS <br />#SECD /30, <br />#SECD /31, <br />#,SECD /32, & <br />#SECD /35 <br />AWARDED TO <br />SLATILE <br />ROOFING & <br />SHEET METAL <br />CO., SOUTH- <br />EAST COMMUN- <br />ITY DEVELOP- <br />MENT PROGRAM <br />)mmissioner Wiggins asked if these bids fall within the cost <br />;timating procedure, and Mr. Crighton advised the Southeast <br />ivisory Board felt they were close enough to our cost estimates <br />iat they would warrant awarding, as the other ones in the pre - <br />?ding Item 6e were not. The other ones had too great a discrepancy <br />?tween the items and quite possibly the contractor just saw a more <br />(pensive way of correcting something on the work needed, but that <br />did not know. This is the second bid set on these rehabilitation, <br />)ntracts. These were bid once before and rejected. Now this is the <br />?cond time around - -the same bidder only - -did not have any more takers <br />i the first time around. The contractor revised all the bids the <br />�cond time. <br />Wiggins moved for the approval as recommended by the Southeast <br />Advisory Committee, and award the Rehabilitation Contracts #SECD /30, <br /># ECD /31, #SECD /32 and #SECD35, to the low and only bidder, Slatile <br />Roofing & Sheet Metal Company, in bid amounts as noted above, subject <br />to Common Council and Legal Counsel approval, in the Southeast Com <br />tmunity Development Program. Motion was seconded by Mr. Robinson and <br />c rried. <br />g. Change Order No. 2 to Rehabilitation Contract No. 275 Southeast <br />C de Enforcement Program, Project E -7: Commission approval was re- <br />q ested of this Change Order, with Barany Sheet Metal & Heating <br />C mpany, for a decrease in contract amount of $4.00, with an amended <br />c ntract total of $6,547.00, for rehabilitation work at: 1816 South <br />St. Joseph Street, in Southeast Code Enforcement Program, Project <br />E 7. <br />CHANGE <br />ORDER NO. 2 <br />TO REHAB. <br />CONTRACT 27 <br />APPROVED, <br />SE CODE EN- <br />FORCEMENT <br />PROGRAM, <br />Mr. James L. Johnson, Jr., Chief Inspector, advised in his memoran- E -7 <br />dim that the specifications called for installing four plugs in the <br />dining room, repairing one plug on the west wall, installing two plugs <br />ii the living room, and installing two plugs in the kitchen. When <br />tie electrician began wiring the structure, he found that the installa- <br />tion of these plugs to be in error. Therefore, the plugs have been <br />r paired and two additional circuits have been added to the existing <br />s rvice, with a reduction in the contract price of $4.00. Staff re- <br />c mmends approval of the change order. <br />- 7 - <br />