My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
RM 02-06-76
sbend
>
Public
>
Redevelopment Commission
>
Minutes
>
1970-1979
>
1976
>
RM 02-06-76
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/6/2012 9:13:52 AM
Creation date
9/21/2012 2:39:20 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
6. NEW BUSINESS (Cont'd <br />negotiated bid of $38,841.00, subject to Commission Legal Counsel <br />and Common Council approval, as per his memorandum dated February <br />4, 1976. <br />The Chair asked Mr. Crighton to respond to this item. Mr. Crighton <br />advised we only had one bidder -- Slatile Roofing & Sheet Metal, <br />Inc., for Contract Set 1, Bureau of Housing, HAO Referral Program, <br />even though the contract was properly advertised and copies of the <br />invitation for bids were mailed out to contractors according to stan- <br />dard procedures. - This relates to the HAO elderly and handicapped <br />referral program we have in force under Community Development. We <br />contacted Mr. Butler, and rather than rejecting the bid and going <br />through the re- advertising procedure, we thought we could do a <br />negotiated bid on this and reduce some of the prices that we felt <br />were high. We have followed Mr. Butler's adviee on this and it <br />is now up to the Commissioners whether they want to accept the <br />negotiated bid or not. <br />The Chair asked how many potential bidders were contacted, and <br />Mr. Crighton advised he believed all 53 bidders that we have on <br />our contractors list were contacted and that Slatile Roofing & <br />Sheet Metal was the only contractor who submitted ,a bonafide bid. <br />Four (4) contractors picked up bid documents but only the one (1) <br />submitted a bid. Whether they felt it was outside their bonding <br />limitations, or they didn't have enough manpower to cover the <br />work, they did not state. These houses also are all over the <br />city, so there is a lot of travel time involved with the con- <br />tractor, and it is more costly in that respect also. <br />Mr. Kevin J. Butler, Commission Legal Counsel, advised that basi- <br />cally the staff thought that it would not be to any avail to re- <br />bid this work and it was felt that they could negotiate certain <br />items within the bid down to reasonable levels or levels they <br />thought they could live with, and it is permitted by law- -the <br />Commission has the right to reject any and all bids. Once the <br />Commission has taken that action, they are in position to negoti- <br />ate for an amount lesser than the lowest bid received. <br />The bids received from Slatile Roofing are shown and the negotiated <br />bid amount: <br />- 10 - <br />Negotiated <br />Bid <br />Contract No. <br />Address <br />Bid <br />Received <br />01 <br />1246 South Bend Ave. <br />$2,115.00 <br />$ 2,165.00 <br />02 <br />150 N. Birdsell St. <br />11900.00 <br />.2,130.00 <br />03 <br />229 N. Huey Street <br />2,565.00 <br />2,450.00 <br />04 <br />1317 W. Indiana Ave. <br />3,090.00 <br />3,360.00 <br />05 <br />1532 Durham Street <br />2,756.00 <br />2,906.00 <br />06 <br />1803 E. Calvert St. <br />2,725.00 <br />2,890.00 <br />07 <br />502 Sherman Ave. <br />3,966.00 <br />4,016.00 <br />08 <br />1043 Portage Ave. <br />1,235.00 <br />1,350.00 <br />09 <br />421 S. Wellington St. <br />3,063.00 <br />3,178.00 <br />10 <br />444 S. Wellington St. <br />170.00 <br />400.00 <br />- 10 - <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.