RM 09-20-74 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

4. e ICATIONS (Cont'd Grant Progress Payment on our Contract Indiana A- 10(LG), transmitted with our letter of August 9, 1974, has been approved in the amount of $965,800.00. This payment has been reduced to this amount to remain within the amount of the executed loan and grant contract. Enclosed was S.F. 1096 indicating setoffs for out- standing direct temporary loans plus interest which have been made against the approved payments. Since there is no remaining balance of the progress payments, we will not receive a check pursuant to the approved payments. HUD letter 'dated September 11; 1974: This letter, over the signature of Mr. Robert W. Dew, Supervisory Construction Analyst (Cost), confirms their telephone conversation of September 10th, that they would not be in a position to recommend the release or withholding of payments to Exterior Designing, Inc., for the reasons outlined in their three -page letter. Mr. Lennon advised this is as a result of internal in- vestigation. We were withholding one of the payment claims for the landscape contract on the River Bend Plaza until some potential wage violations or other conduct was taken care of by Mr. Burroff for payment. An investigative team did investigate it from HUD, and they are of the opinion that we no longer should hold their checks as they are in accordance now with the necessary documents. We have released authoriza- tion for claim payment and the Redevelopment Commis- sioners are signing it today for the firm. Indiana Bell Telephone Company, Inc. letter dated September 11, 1974: This letter, over the signature of Mr. E. R. Hennon, Engineering Manager, advises of the relocation work in the downtown urban renewal area and the billing enclosed. The previous billing was presented to us in their letter dated January 3, 1974. The billing is submitted on Estimate 7692 and a portion of the work is still in progress; therefore, the amount billed includes an estimated amount for that portion which has not been completed. Also attached were copies of the work prints and the estimated construc- tion costs of Estimate 7692. The portion of the construction work is outlined which was used in de- termining the reimbursable amounts. The plant better- ment involved is partially reimbursable. They also show the portion of their construction work that was considered non - reimbursable. The breakdown of the costs associated with their work shows the total cost, less plant betterment, less non - reimbursable and the reimbursable cost to our department. EXTERIOR DESIGNING, INC., R -66 INDIANA BELL TELEPHONE CO., INC., RELOCATION, R -66