My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
RM 09-20-74
sbend
>
Public
>
Redevelopment Commission
>
Minutes
>
1970-1979
>
1974
>
RM 09-20-74
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/6/2012 10:07:51 AM
Creation date
9/20/2012 1:03:22 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
5. LD BU$INE$S (Cont'd) <br />Investment of'Funds from Project'Expenditures Accounts: <br />Mr. Lennon advised he was pleased to announce that <br />through good fiscal management of Larry Wartha and his <br />staff, we have invested $410,000 and that between now <br />and December 12, 1974, we will realize a gain of <br />$12,000. All of our projects are in the "black" with <br />the exception of the situation we have in the code en- <br />forcement projects where the city owes us money, which <br />they are to pay us when their revenue sharing money <br />comes in, in October. We are fiscally and financially <br />in very good shape, and he felt Larry Wartha is to be <br />commended. <br />On motion by Mr. Chenney, seconded by Mr. Wiggins and <br />unanimously carried, post approval was given for the <br />investment of the $410,000 from the Project Expenditures <br />Accounts, to purchase Treasury Bills, for a gain of <br />$12,000. <br />Mr. Wartha advised we received the grant amendatory on <br />our A -10 Project and will probably be able to invest <br />$100,000 of that later also, and whether to include <br />the motion as a "lump" permission. <br />Commissioner Wiggins said that this has been a standard <br />operating procedure throughout the life of the Depart- <br />ment of Redevelopment - -any monies that are not immediately <br />needed are invested- -just as a good business procedure. <br />Mr. Lennon advised that our problem has been that prior <br />we borrowed money from the Projects. The R -66 Project- - <br />which was a multi - million dollar project - -the previous <br />fiscal officers borrowed from that account to start other <br />Code Enforcement Projects, and in so doing, we obviously <br />took money away from being invested because it was used <br />for normal operating costs instead of going to the City <br />Council. Looking at it, it is still city money, but the <br />money went back into the project account and made us look <br />somewhat negligent, because we were not in a position to <br />do so because we were always borrowing money from our- <br />selves, instead of borrowing money from the City. Mr. <br />Lennon stated he was pleased to hear Commissioner Wiggins <br />agree with us and we will, in the future, continue to <br />operate on the basis of depositing, and as he said, Larry <br />and the staff has everything in the black and we have paid <br />back all the accounts, and that is excellent. <br />Commissioner Wiggins, in reply to the Chair's question, <br />said he didn't see that a blanket approval is necessary, <br />but that the requests for investment be placed on the <br />Agenda as they come up, as this has been normal procedure. <br />- 10 <br />POST APPROVAL FOR <br />INVESTMENT OF <br />FUNDS AUTHORIZED <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.