Laserfiche WebLink
5. dLD BUSINESS (Cont'd) <br />t. Frances Shop: This item was also discussed in the <br />prior session Executive Session) with the public present <br />at great length. Mr. Bob Fischgrund with the Frances <br />Shop advised of the bids received for the sidewalk resur- <br />face g. He requested additional financial help towards <br />the realities of the cost and whether the Commissioners <br />woulc reconsider their previous offer of the $1,000 credit. <br />This has resulted because of the Frances' Shop own volition <br />to leave the sidewalk there and their underground heating <br />and are now willing to abandon the underground heating for <br />uniformity if need be. With the damages to their walk and <br />in comparison to the: other walks they now would like to <br />request a reasonable share in the cost of replacement. <br />They were agreeable to pay for the inflationary figure for <br />thei share based on last years amount and to divide the <br />cost in third's. <br />Mr. iggins said the Commission would be willing to propose <br />the ligure on what the price might have been to do the work <br />at the time and figure the inflationary figure because Mr. <br />Fisc grund had made the decision when the sidewalk requests <br />were made by us for the mall, and now the Frances Shop is <br />stuc for it, and on that basis we take the 2/3, less the <br />inflationary figure - -what we would have done had he not made <br />the ecision. <br />Mr. Lennon said the Frances Shop would be paying for the non- <br />public walk, plus his inflationary figure for the decision he <br />made at that time. Mr. Fischgrund agreed to this and the de- <br />cisi n was left unanimously to meet with him the first of the <br />week with an executed document to show the agreed upon amount. <br />6. NEW BUSINESS <br />FRANCES SHOP <br />SIDEWALK REPLACEMENT <br />CONCURRENCE, R -66 <br />. Resolution No. 487: This Resolution authorizes the RESOLUTION NO. 487 <br />subm ssion of the Amendatory Application for the Code Enforce- ADOPTED, E -3 <br />ment Grant, Project Indiana E -3, for the purpose of increasing <br />the mount of Project Grant. <br />On m tion by Rev. Williams, seconded by Mr. Wiggins and unani- <br />mously carried, Resolution No. 487 was adopted. <br />Dun & Bradstreet Contract: Post approval was requested DUN & BRADSTREET <br />for ontract renewal with Dun & Bradstreet, in amount of $815.00, CONTRACT APPROVED, <br />whic covers up to 100 reports. R -66 <br />Mr. I.ennon advised this is a HUD requirement. We have never <br />used 100 per year which is more than sufficient. Dun & Brad- <br />street needed the executed copy prior to the end of the month; <br />hence the post approval request. <br />On m tion by Mr. Chenney, seconded by Mr. Wiggins and unani- <br />mous y carried, the Dun & Bradstreet contract was authorized <br />in amount of $815.00. <br />-8- <br />