Laserfiche WebLink
6. NLW BUSINESS (Cont'd <br />Mr. Butler, Commission Legal Counsel, suggested we check <br />with he developers and our engineering consultants if all <br />the concrete needs to be cleared, as we may not need to <br />clear it for the full depth, which is 12 feet below the <br />sidewalk and three feet below that - -all reinforced con- <br />crete Mr. Wiggins requested this be discussed with The <br />Hicke Company as they built the building. <br />Mr. E Bauer advised that all of that land was formerly <br />a lan fill and that it may be foundation piers to keep <br />the b ilding from falling down the hill, which was in <br />refer nce to Dan Caesar's comment that Dan Clark had told <br />him a out the columns. Mr. Bauer said if the building was <br />built for a five- or six -story building, the chances are <br />one i a million that they would fall in the right place. <br />This item was tabled for research and action was deferred <br />until the next Commission meeting, scheduled for January <br />2, 19 4. Mr. Slabaugh is to check out the information. <br />d. Temporary and /-op Semi - Permanent Lighting: Authori - <br />zatio was requested for the installation of three (3) <br />light poles in the 100 block of North Michigan Street, in <br />an amount not to exceed $360.00, R -66. I &M is attempting <br />to re energize existing power sources in the 100 block of <br />North Michigan Street. This is in front of Wyman's build- <br />ing. If the existing sources cannot be re- energized, <br />then hree (3) poles will do the work, at a cost of $120.00 <br />each, or a total of $360.00. <br />The City is requesting we have I &M put the three poles in <br />and they will pay for the electricity. Mr. Lennon said <br />the store owners are concerned about the lighting. Mr. <br />Helmen felt we should help the merchants. <br />The motion was made by Mr. Wiggins to approve this cost, <br />tentative authorization if the existing sources cannot be <br />re-energized., seconded by Rev. Williams and unanimously <br />carried. <br />e. South Bend Parking Co., Inc. Lease: Authorization <br />was re uested for the execution of a lease with the South <br />Bend Parking Co., Inc., in Block 4, Parcels 42 and 66, R -66. <br />To hava and to hold Parcel One, as shown in Lease, for a <br />term of one (1) year commencing on December 15, 1973; and <br />to hav and to hold Parcel Two as a tenant from month -to- <br />month ommencing on December 15, 1973, upon terms and condi- <br />tions s provided in the lease, totalling 22 items. <br />There s a 60 -day termination clause in the lease to protect us <br />if Associates would need this land prior to the end of the one - <br />year term. Legal Counsel is to negotiate for reimbursement on <br />a per-month basis of $100.00 maximum, in the event our Depart- <br />ment would have to terminate the lease within the one -year <br />period not if it is on their own. This would be for expenses <br />r <br />TEMPORARY AND /OR <br />SEMI - PERMANENT <br />LIGHTING AUTHORIZED, <br />R -66 <br />SOUTH BEND PARKING <br />CO., INC. LEASE, <br />BLOCK 4 , PARCELS 42 <br />& 66, R -66 <br />