6. NEW BUSINESS (Cont'd)
<br />A- 10,1SE #1 Project:
<br />! —I Parcel No.
<br />66 -35
<br />59 -27
<br />66 -36
<br />66 -37
<br />On mo ion by Mr. Wiggins, seconded by Mr. Wade and unanimously
<br />carri d, the above seven (7) Option Agreements were approved.
<br />o. Proclaimer No. 2, SE #1 A -10: Post approval was re-
<br />quested of Proclaimer No. 2, to cover 70 parcels as shown
<br />on Exhibit A, in amount of $152,550.00, in the NDP Project
<br />A -10, SE #1.
<br />Mr. Lennon advised Commission did approve Proclaimer No. 1,
<br />for 35 parcels totalling $111,860.00, for MN #1, A -10, in
<br />Commission meeting of July 20, 1973. We should have requested
<br />approval for the Southeast acquisition also, as shown above.
<br />On mot'on by Mr. Wiggins, seconded by Mr. Wade and unanimously
<br />carrie , post approval was authorized for Proclaimer No. 2,
<br />SE #1, A -10 Project, in amount of $152,550.00.
<br />PROCLAIMER NO. 2
<br />SE #1, A -10, POST
<br />APPROVAL AUTHORIZED
<br />uent Rents, R -57: Post approval was requested to
<br />Address
<br />Amount
<br />141
<br />E.
<br />Elder
<br />Street
<br />$3,800.017
<br />217
<br />E.
<br />Paris
<br />Street
<br />5,450.00
<br />121
<br />E.
<br />Elder
<br />Street
<br />2,500.00
<br />221
<br />E.
<br />Paris
<br />Street
<br />4,650.00
<br />225
<br />E.
<br />Paris
<br />Street
<br />3,175.00
<br />On mo ion by Mr. Wiggins, seconded by Mr. Wade and unanimously
<br />carri d, the above seven (7) Option Agreements were approved.
<br />o. Proclaimer No. 2, SE #1 A -10: Post approval was re-
<br />quested of Proclaimer No. 2, to cover 70 parcels as shown
<br />on Exhibit A, in amount of $152,550.00, in the NDP Project
<br />A -10, SE #1.
<br />Mr. Lennon advised Commission did approve Proclaimer No. 1,
<br />for 35 parcels totalling $111,860.00, for MN #1, A -10, in
<br />Commission meeting of July 20, 1973. We should have requested
<br />approval for the Southeast acquisition also, as shown above.
<br />On mot'on by Mr. Wiggins, seconded by Mr. Wade and unanimously
<br />carrie , post approval was authorized for Proclaimer No. 2,
<br />SE #1, A -10 Project, in amount of $152,550.00.
<br />PROCLAIMER NO. 2
<br />SE #1, A -10, POST
<br />APPROVAL AUTHORIZED
<br />On motion by Mr. Wiggins, seconded by Mr. Chenney and unani-
<br />mously carried, the delinquent rents dated December 1, 1971,
<br />in amount of $8,066.05, post approval for charge -off was
<br />author zed.
<br />7.
<br />a.
<br />tacted
<br />spondee
<br />when tr
<br />b.
<br />ment r
<br />Design
<br />Way.
<br />nated
<br />front
<br />Inns .
<br />reques
<br />activi
<br />PROGRESS REPORTS
<br />LaSalle Park Report: Mr. Lennon advised we have con -
<br />all of the contractors who were involved and all re-
<br />to the certified letters. We will negotiate a time
<br />e job will be completed.
<br />Sculpture Reports: Mr. Lennon advised we have an equip -
<br />port from our consultant, Environmental Planning and
<br />concerning the Sculptural -Play Place for the Pedestrian
<br />map with the area depicted for the Play Place is desig-
<br />s "J ", which is immediately north of Western Avenue, in
<br />f Lounge Optical area, directly across from the new Royal
<br />They are recommending this area for the sculpture and are
<br />ing the Redevelopment Commission to perform the following
<br />ies:
<br />-10 -
<br />LASALLE PARK REPORT,
<br />R -57
<br />SCULPTURE REPORTS,
<br />R -66
<br />uent Rents, R -57: Post approval was requested to
<br />DELINQUENT RENTS,
<br />charDelin
<br />ge
<br />off delinquent rents,
<br />in LaSalle Park, R -57, per HUD
<br />POST APPROVAL AUTHOR-
<br />auditor's
<br />'list
<br />request to have it
<br />officially on record. The delin -,
<br />IZED FOR WRITE -OFF,
<br />quent
<br />is dated December
<br />1, 1973, in amount of $8,066.05,
<br />R -57
<br />which we
<br />have been unable to
<br />collect.
<br />On motion by Mr. Wiggins, seconded by Mr. Chenney and unani-
<br />mously carried, the delinquent rents dated December 1, 1971,
<br />in amount of $8,066.05, post approval for charge -off was
<br />author zed.
<br />7.
<br />a.
<br />tacted
<br />spondee
<br />when tr
<br />b.
<br />ment r
<br />Design
<br />Way.
<br />nated
<br />front
<br />Inns .
<br />reques
<br />activi
<br />PROGRESS REPORTS
<br />LaSalle Park Report: Mr. Lennon advised we have con -
<br />all of the contractors who were involved and all re-
<br />to the certified letters. We will negotiate a time
<br />e job will be completed.
<br />Sculpture Reports: Mr. Lennon advised we have an equip -
<br />port from our consultant, Environmental Planning and
<br />concerning the Sculptural -Play Place for the Pedestrian
<br />map with the area depicted for the Play Place is desig-
<br />s "J ", which is immediately north of Western Avenue, in
<br />f Lounge Optical area, directly across from the new Royal
<br />They are recommending this area for the sculpture and are
<br />ing the Redevelopment Commission to perform the following
<br />ies:
<br />-10 -
<br />LASALLE PARK REPORT,
<br />R -57
<br />SCULPTURE REPORTS,
<br />R -66
<br />
|