My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
RM 06-02-72
sbend
>
Public
>
Redevelopment Commission
>
Minutes
>
1970-1979
>
1972
>
RM 06-02-72
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/6/2012 10:34:45 AM
Creation date
9/12/2012 12:34:57 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
W, <br />NEW BUSINESS (Cont'd) <br />Mr. Chenney moved for the adoption <br />40 and 404, seconded by Mr. Wade <br />ca ried. <br />of Resolution Nos. <br />and unanimously <br />1. Change Order No. 2 to Demolition Contract No. <br />23-B: This Change Order requests an extension of <br />ninety (90) calendar days to perform the demolition <br />wo k on Contract 23 -B. This delay was due to not re- <br />ceiving HUD signatory approval sooner. The bids were <br />taken on January 12 and HUD concurrence to award the <br />contract was not received until May 1. Legally a bidder <br />onl needs to hold their bid for sixty (60) days, after <br />which time the bidder can state they are no longer inter- <br />ested. <br />The recommendation to the Commission is they authorize <br />the extension of time. The change order is dated May 19, <br />1972 and the ninety (90) day extension would be from <br />that date. The contractor will probably complete it <br />in less time. If this was to be re- advertised and rebid <br />it Would take longer. <br />On otion by Mr. Wade, seconded by Mr. Chenney, Change <br />Or er No. 2 to Demolition Contract No. 23 -B was approved <br />an unanimously carried. <br />CHANGE ORDER NO. 2 <br />TO DEMOLITION CONTRACT <br />23 -B APPROVED, R -66 <br />m. Southeast, Ind. A -10 Project: Mr. Taylor ad- SOUTHEAST PROJECT, <br />vied the Commissioners of the meeting of the Southeast IND. A -10 <br />Neighborhood PAC Committee with the HUD Officials, in <br />Indianapolis. We have received a letter from Mr. David <br />Ma r indicating the discussions held at that meeting. <br />The Commission suggested a meeting be set with the PAC <br />Executive Committee and the Redevelopment Commission, in <br />the Redevelopment Office, to see what can be done and <br />what success the PAC Committee had in Indianapolis. The <br />Executive Director was requested to get in touch with <br />Mr. Garrett Mullins to set up this meeting. <br />7.1 PROGRESS REPORTS <br />a. Business Relocation, R -66: Mr. John A. Kotzen- BUSINESS RELOCATION, <br />ma her, Business Relocation Officer, submitted a written R -66 <br />rep rt, for May's activities: <br />5 claims <br />for moving expenses <br />$ 95,184.66 <br />1 claim <br />for direct loss of property <br />3,000.00 <br />1 claim <br />for alternate payment <br />9,692.75 <br />Total relocation payments $107,877.41 <br />:iu1E <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.