SM 08-09-71 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

6. NEW BUSINESS (Cont'd Mr. John Kag l said South Bend is one of the few cities in the Nation whose building is owned directly by the post office and not leased from a developer. The Re- development Commission is to be commended for their diligence in staying on trap of this thing to make certain it w s not extracted from the program. . Mr. Cole advised the post office was held up by the administrative changeover in the postal system, shoe duled for co struction this summer, and if the.land deal had not been worked out with the.Redevelopment Commission, he whole project might have been cancelled out by the F deral Government. Mr. Cole advle sed a half size of the photograph, in color, will brought in for the Commission. e. Demolition Contract No. 16: Advertisement by invitation for Demolition Contract No. 16 was received in Commissior meeting of July 2, 1971. Nine (9) firms were contact d, with the following three (3) bidding: Name of Contractor Bid Received Rieth -Riley Construction Co., Inc. $18,060.00 ** 24355 State Road 23 South Bend, Ihdiana Ed Siebert & Sons Contracting. Co. $ 4,675.00 ** 131 E. 2nd Street Michigan City, Ind. 46360 Ri tschard Brothers $ 3,790.00 ** 1204 West Sample Street South Bend, Indiana ** Amount Department of Redevelopment pays the con- tractor. On motion by Mr. Wiggins, seconded by Mr. Wade, Demoli- tion Contract No. 16 was awarded to the low bidder, Ritsch.ard Bros., South Bend, Indiana, in the amount of $3,790.00, subject to HUD concurrence. DEMOLLTION CONTRACT N0: 16; AWARDED 'TO: RITSCHARD BROTHERS, INC., R -66 f. Change Order No. 1 to Contract No. 9: This. is CHANGE ORDER NO. I authorization to remove thirty -four feet, leave six TO CONTRACT NO. 9 r% feet of ofun ation wall along the alley to protect APPROVED, R -66 the building on the South, which is Inwood's Annex. This is for Parcel No. 22 -9, Progressive Bakery, 419 -1/2 South Michigan Street. There is no change in time, nor change in the amount of the contract. On Motion by Mr. Wiggins, seconded by Mr. Wade, Change Order No. 1 to contract No. 9 was approved and motion unanimously carried. 10.