Laserfiche WebLink
x, <br />6. NEW1 <br />BUSINESS (Cont'd <br />g. <br />ouse Site Improvement Plan: <br />Approval was <br />re- <br />''HOUSE SITE IMPROVEMENT <br />quested <br />of a house site improvement <br />plan for Parcel <br />No.'- <br />PLAN AUTHORIZED, PARCEL <br />17 -12, located <br />at 200 South Kentucky <br />Street, R -57. <br />The <br />NO. 17 -12, R -57 <br />houseis o -be built by Hartman Builders at a cost of <br />$18,500' The set back and side 'clearance conforms to the <br />Urban Re ewal plan. <br />Motion w s made'by Mr. Wiggins, seconded by Rev. Williams, <br />for the pproval of the plans, subsequent to approval by <br />our staf . Motion was unanimously carried. <br />h, Option Agreement, R -66: Approval and-authori- <br />zation was requested for the President to sign one (1) <br />Option Agreement, in the Central Downtown Urban Renewal <br />Project, R -66, for Parcel No. 28 -12, located at 633 E.`' <br />Monroe Street. <br />On motion by Mr. Chenney, seconded by Mr, Wiggins, the <br />above-"Stated Option Agreement was approved and the <br />President authorized to sign. Motion was unanimously <br />carried. <br />ONE'(1) OPTION AGREE- <br />MENT APPROVED, PARCEL <br />NO. 28 -12, R -66 <br />i. ehabilitation Grants: Authorization was re TWO ,(2),REHABILITATION, <br />quested for two 2 Rehabilitation Grants, in'the LaSalle 'GRANTS APPROVED, PARCEL <br />Park Urban Renewal Project, R -57, for'the following NOS: 21 -20 & 25 =5, R -57 <br />parcels, n the amount of $3,500 each <br />arcel No. Address <br />1 -20 142 N. Illinois'Street <br />5 -5 114 S. Chicago Street <br />On motio by Mr. Wiggins, seconded by Rev. Williams, <br />the abov two Rehabilitation Grants were authorized <br />and unan mously carried. <br />7. PRO RESS REPORTS <br />a. nvestors and Tenants`, R -66: Mr. Ashenfeltery INVESTORS AND TENANTS, <br />advised equests are coming from investors to learn R -66 <br />about th availability of land and tenants are inter- <br />ested in leasing possibilities. There is a need to <br />bring these people together. <br />Mr. Helm en said this is a matter of communications, <br />and his thought was that the Chamber of Commerce <br />would be the best source to give this information. <br />The businesses being dislocated should be informed <br />there wi 1 be facilities available. <br />Mrs. Janet S. Allen, Common'Council member, agreed <br />the Downtown Council would be the proper one to give' <br />the list of the tenants to. The Chair concurred in <br />this. <br />-7- <br />