Laserfiche WebLink
RFP Selection Rating for City of South Bend Des. No. 1801240 <br />(City, County, Town) or (Local Public Agency) <br />Services Description: Flashing School Beacons for 39 Schools <br />Consultant Name: <br />Evaluation Criteria to be Rated by Scorers <br />Category Scoring Criteria <br />Performance evaluation score averages from historical performance data. <br />Past Quality score for similar work from performance database. <br />Performance Schedule score from performance database. <br />Res onsiveness score from performance database. <br />Capacityof :valuation of the team's personnel and equipment to perform the project on time. <br />Team to do Availability of more than adequate capacity that results in added value. <br />Adequate capacity to meet the schedule. <br />Work insufficient available capacity to meet the schedule. <br />Technical Expertise: Unique Resources that yield a relevant added value or <br />efficiency to the deliverable. <br />Team's Demonstrated outstanding expertise and resources identified <br />Demonstrated for required services for value added benefit. <br />Qualifications Demonstrated high level of expertise and resources identified <br />for required services for value added benefit. <br />Expertise and resources at appropriate level. <br />Insufficient ex ertise and/or resources. <br />Predicted ability to manage the project, based on: experience in size, complexity, <br />type, subs, documentation skills. <br />Project Demonstrated outstanding experience in similar type and complexity. <br />Manager Demonstrated high level of experience in similar type and complexity. <br />Experience in similar type and complexity shown in resume. <br />Experience in different type or lower complexity. <br />Insufficient experience. <br />Project Understanding and Innovation that provides cost and/or time savings. <br />Approach to High level of understanding and viable innovative ideas proposed. <br />Project High level of understanding of the project. <br />Basic understanding of the project. <br />Lack of Droiect understandine. <br />Scale Score Weight Weighted <br />Score <br />—0i 6 1 <br />_i' . Ga <br />2 <br />1 <br />0 <br />-3 <br />20 n <br />15 ,5 <br />20 <br />G <br />15 <br />15 <br />Weighted Sub -Total: <br />It is the responsibility of scorers to make every effort to identify the firm most capable of producing the highest deliverables in a timely and cost <br />effective manner without regard to personal preference. <br />I certify that I do not have any conflicts of interest associated with this consultant as defined in 49CFR1 18.36. <br />L <br />ON <br />I have thoroughly reviewed the letter of interest for this consultant and certify that the above scores represent my best judgment of this firm's abilities. <br />Signature: A,�t, <br />Title; <br />(Form Rev. 4-7-16) <br />Print Name: kc,a <br />Date: <br />