Laserfiche WebLink
RFP Selection Rating for Ciy of South Bend <br />Des. No. 1801240 <br />(City, County, Town) or (Local Public Agency) <br />Services Description: Flas ing School Beacons for 39 Schools <br />Consultant Name: <br />Evaluation Criteria to be Rated by Scorers <br />Category <br />Scoring Criteria <br />Scale Score Weight Weighted <br />Score <br />(Past <br />Performance evaluation score averages from historical performance data. <br />Quality score for similar work from performance database. <br />6 <br />Perrormance <br />Schedule score from performance database. <br />7 3� <br />Responsiveness score from performance database. <br />1 <br />Capacity of <br />Evaluation of the team's personnel and equipment to perform the project on time. <br />Team to do <br />Availability of more than adequate capacity that results in added value. <br />Adequate to <br />I 20 <br />Work <br />capacity meet the schedule. <br />0 V <br />Insufficient available ca acr to meet the schedule. . <br />1 <br />Technical Expertise: Unique Resources that yield a relevant added value or <br />efficiency to the deliverable. <br />Team's <br />Demonstrated outstanding expertise and resources identified <br />2 <br />Demonstrated <br />for required services for value added benefit. <br />j 15 <br />Qualifications <br />Demonstrated high level of expertise and resources identified <br />1 1 is <br />for required services for value added benefit. <br />Expertise and resources at appropriate level. <br />0 <br />Insufficient expertise and/or resources. <br />-3 <br />Predicted ability to manage the project, based on: experience in size, complexity, <br />type, subs, documentation skills. <br />Project <br />Demonstrated outstanding experience in similar type and complexity. <br />2 <br />Manager <br />Demonstrated high level of experience in similar type and complexity. <br />1 /. 20 <br />Experience in similar type and complexity shown in resume, <br />0 <br />Experience in different type or lower complexity. <br />-1 l/1l <br />Insufficient cx ience. <br />-3 <br />Project Understanding and Innovation that provides cost and/or time savings. <br />Approach to <br />J High level of understanding and viable innovative ideas proposed. <br />2 <br />Project <br />High levelof the project. <br />oc <br />1 15 <br />understanding <br />_ andi, of the project. <br />0 <br />Weighted Sub -Total:) <br />r <br />It is the responsibility of scorers to make every effort to identify the firm most capable of producing the highest deliverables in a timely and cost <br />effective manner without regard to personal preference. <br />I certify that 1 do not have any conflicts of interest associated with this consultant as defined in 49CFR1 18.36. <br />I have thoroughly reviewed the letter of interest for this consultant and certify that the above scores represent my best judgment of this firm's abilities. <br />Signature: AhN,,1 Print Name: �✓ t, �✓�la <br />Title: tC �d) I"�. Dater, . .. �. _.. �. <br />a-. <br />(Form Rev, 4-7-16) <br />