Laserfiche WebLink
RFP Selection Raking for Ciq of South Bend Des. No. 1801240 <br />(City, County, Town) or (Local Public Agency) <br />Services Description: Flashin School Beacons for 39 Schools <br />Consultant Name: 'S i p r I 1' <br />Evaluation Criteria to be Rated by Scorers <br />Category <br />B �'Y <br />Scoring Criteria <br />g <br />Scale <br />Score <br />Weighted <br />Weight <br />Score <br />Performance evaluation score averages from historical performance data. <br />Past <br />Quality score for similar work from performance database. <br />6 <br />Performance <br />Schedule score from perlinmunce database. <br />3 <br />It4-s onsiveness score from wrl'onnance database. <br />,>, <br />1 <br />Capacity of <br />Evaluation of the team's personnel and equipment to perform the project on time. <br />Team to do <br />Availability of more than adequate capacity that results in added value. <br />Adequate <br />1 <br />20 <br />Work <br />capacity to meet the schedule. <br />0 <br />Insufficient available EVIcity to meet the schedule. <br />-1 <br />Technical Expertise: Unique Resources that yield a relevant added value or <br />efficiency to the deliverable. <br />Team's <br />Demonstrated outstanding expertise and resources identified <br />2 <br />Demonstrated <br />l f i for required services or value added benefit, <br />Demonstrated high level identified <br />� <br />15 <br />3 <br />Qualifications <br />of expertise and resources <br />I <br />for required services for value added benefit, <br />Expertise and resources at appropriate level. <br />0 <br />Insufficient ex isc and/or resources. <br />-3 <br />Predicted ability to manage the project, based on: experience in size, complexity, <br />type, subs, documentation skills. <br />Project <br />Demonstrated outstanding experience in similar type and complexity. <br />2 <br />Manager <br />Demonstrated high level of cx13cricnce in Similar type and Complexity. <br />1 <br />I <br />20 <br />hxpericnec in similar ty;v and complexity shown in resume. <br />0 <br />Experience in different type or lower complexity. <br />-1 <br />Insufficient ex erience. <br />-3 <br />Project Understanding and Innovation that provides cost and/or time savings - <br />Approach to <br />High level of understanding and viable innovative ideas proposed. <br />2 <br />Project <br />High level of understanding of the project. <br />1 <br />I <br />15 I S <br />Basic understanding of the project. <br />0 <br />Lack of ppject undcrstandin . <br />-3 <br />Weighted <br />Sub-Totah �j 5 <br />It is the responsibility of scorers to make every effort to identify the firm most capable of producing the highest deliverables in a timely and cost <br />effective manner without regard to personal preference. <br />I certify that I do not have any conflicts of interest associated with this consultant as defined in 49CFRI 18.36. <br />I have thoroughly reviewed the letter of interest for this consultant and certify that the above scores represent my best judgment or this firm's abilities_ <br />Signature: <br />Title: ` t" <br />l <br />(Form Rev. 4-7-16) <br />Print Name: <br />Date: tV.. . . <br />