Laserfiche WebLink
Area Board of Zoning Appeals—January 4, 2012 <br /> MRS. HENRY: Mr. Hawley? <br /> MR. HAWLEY: Yes. <br /> MRS. HENRY: Mr. Crumlish? <br /> MR. CRUMLISH: Yes. <br /> MRS. HENRY: Mr. Matthys? <br /> MR. MATT14YS: Yes. <br /> MRS. HENRY: Mr. VeIleman? <br /> MR. VELLEMAN: Yes. <br /> MRS. HENRY: Mr. Phipps? <br /> MR. PHIPPS: Yes. <br /> MRS. HENRY: Mr. Urbanski? <br /> MR. URBANSKI: Yes. So the variances with the exception of two and seven which is the buffer and the <br /> parking spaces. Now can we send it with a favorable recommendation because they would need...? <br /> MR. PHIPPS: Well I think we can send it so I'll make a motion to send it with an unfavorable <br /> recommendation but with the recommendation that if it is approved by the Common Council it would be <br /> only with the condition that no alcohol would be served. The reason why is, I guess I'm comfortable with <br /> this proposed use. It seems to me it's too much like a bar with pool tables,the size, the addition of the <br /> outdoor patio, maybe you can make a business for it with non-alcoholic beverage and two pool tables but it <br /> doesn't seem logical to me so I'm more comfortable... <br /> MR. URBANSKI: 2,000 square foot building. <br /> MR. PHIPPS: Yeah, especially if major structural changes to change it from a cleaners to a cafe. Tome it <br /> just doesn't quite add up. So I move that we send it with an unfavorable recommendation but the note that <br /> the condition that if is approved by the City Council it would include the condition that there be no alcoholic <br /> beverages. <br /> MR. HAWLEY: I'll second that. <br /> MR. URBANSKI: Call for the vote please. <br /> 30 <br />