Laserfiche WebLink
Area Board of Zoning Appeals—January 4, 2012 <br /> MR. VELLEMAN: Well there's actually eight variances, well actually seven variance and on Special <br /> Exception so...do take it line by line if you've got an updated one because... <br /> MR. FEDDER: Well I don't have an updated one either. <br /> MR. VELLEMAN: I guess my question is, I agree with you on the parking, but the existing building needs <br /> three variances on it as it is right now even if anything was not to change they would those three variances <br /> without the parking. <br /> MR. PHIPPS: I would be in favor of approving the variances for the location of the existing building. <br /> MR. VELLEMAN: We can't change the building. I mean that's what it boils down to, so...since there's <br /> numbers on their request, can we take it number by number? <br /> MR. PHIPPS: Well the two variances that I would move that we deny would be the reduction of the on site <br /> parking spaces and the... <br /> MR. VELLEMAN: Number six, to allow one parking space closer from the required 15'to Terrace Lane <br /> down to 8'? <br /> MR. PHIPPS: Well I can see with any use of that building there might be some encroachment of parking <br /> into that. I guess the two that the Plan Commission recommended I would deny those two, the screening <br /> from the residential area and the number of parking spaces. <br /> MRS. HENRY: So you're talking number two and number seven? <br /> MR.VELLEMAN: Gotcha. <br /> MR. PHIPPS: Likely if we deny those two it would require another site plan. <br /> MR. URBANSKI. We have a motion on the floor, do we have a second? <br /> MR. PHIPPS: Then if the ones we approve would be subject to the Special Exception being approved. <br /> MR. VELLEMAN: Second. <br /> MR. URBANSKI: Call for the vote please. <br /> MRS. HENRY: We have a motion to deny variance number two and seven of the revised petition which <br /> deal with the number of parking spaces and the screening and subject to the Special Exception being <br /> approved by the Council was made by Mr. Phipps and seconded by Mr. Velleman. Mr. Young? <br /> MR. YOUNG: Yes. <br /> 29 <br />