Laserfiche WebLink
Written Proposal Evaluation: <br />Given the RFP's defined evaluation criteria, the City's selection team considered 7 proposals in <br />its Written Proposal Evaluation stage. Per the expectations set out in the RFF\ Cost was not <br />given a point score until every other criteria had been determined by our selection team to <br />mitigate cost bias. <br />The selection team chose Advanced Utility Billing, Cogsdale, and Systems & Software tomove <br />on to provide software demonstrations, as indicated in the "CloVd"section's ranking inthe <br />table above. As vendors provided both Cloud and On-Prennise costs in their proposals, two <br />different cost scores were calculated. While Advanced Utility Billing and Cogsdale made the top <br />three regardless ofCloud orOn-Premise pricing, CU5|and Systems &SOftvvare'sinclusion iOthe <br />top three was dependent onwhich cost score was applied. The selection team decided to <br />elevate the Systems 0\Software proposal tothe #3spot, asthe average cost score between <br />Cloud and On -Premise options is higher for Systems &3oftvvare than it would befor CU5|. <br />