Laserfiche WebLink
Demonstration Evaluation: <br />Advanced Utility Billing 1 5.0 8.3 13.3 8.0 34.6 <br />15.0 25.0 40.0 17.5, <br />10.0 16.7 261 20.0 <br />In Demonstration Evaluation, three vendors were scored based on their performance in a day- <br />long, on -site software demo inclusive of implementation methodology.The selection team <br />scored each vendor for all criteria minus Cost with a rank of 1-3 (1 being most favored,, 3 being <br />least favored), with points granted in proportion to rank (Le., a rank of I for Approach grants 25 <br />points, whereas, a rank of 3 grants 8.3 points). Cost score was calculated using the formula <br />described in the RFP, while limiting the scope of the calculation to the three remaining vendors <br />and using the Cloud cost figure for point calculation. <br />Immediately following Demonstration Evaluation, Co,gsdale was viewed as the leading proposal, <br />and the City began more detailed exploratory conversations with Cogsdale. Following these <br />conversations, the City learned more about the Cogsd'ale solution and confirmed that <br />technologically this would not be the best solution: for the City. The selection team then moved <br />on to the next vendor, Systems & Software, for more detailed exploratory conversations and as <br />a result, Systems & Software was the final selection. This change i:n focus and ultimate <br />selection is indicated in the table above, where Cogsdale's score is crossed out and Systems & <br />Software's score is shaded. <br />Thank you, <br />Matt Coats <br />3 <br />