My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-21-01 Redevelopment Commission Minutes
sbend
>
Public
>
Redevelopment Commission
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2001
>
12-21-01 Redevelopment Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/2/2012 12:42:23 PM
Creation date
8/3/2011 4:00:49 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
South Bend Redevelopment Commission <br />Regular Meeting— December 21, 2001 <br />6. NEW BUSINESS (CONT.) <br />C. South Bend Central Development Area <br />(Continued...) <br />(2) Continued... <br />former Wharf site. <br />After extensive negotiations with Holladay <br />Corp., the City agreed to make a seven <br />million dollar investment to facilitate future <br />development in the East Bank. As a result <br />of those negotiations, we used up <br />approximately 75% of our level of effort <br />with Lehman and Lehman. At the same <br />time, we realized the master plan effort for <br />the East Bank was going to require more <br />work than was originally anticipated. <br />We asked Lehman and Lehman to submit an <br />addendum to their proposal to include <br />holding several meetings with major stake <br />holders, a meeting with the community -at- <br />large, and development of a neighborhood <br />association for the East Bank. The <br />addendum proposed an additional cost of <br />$35,000 to the original agreement. The staff <br />recommends accepting the addendum to <br />agreement. <br />Ms. Greene noted that the total cost <br />($55,000) is still below the level that would <br />require using the public bid process for this <br />work. The addendum to agreement prepared <br />incorporates the language generally used in <br />our professional services agreement. <br />Mr. Mathia also noted that using the public <br />bid process would put us behind schedule <br />for developing the master plan. The staff <br />would like to continue using Lehman and <br />7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.