Laserfiche WebLink
OLIth Bend Redevelopment `ommissioll <br />l esel edUled ReCrular Meeting ­.May 8, 2007 <br />6. NEW BUSINESS (CONT.) <br />C. South Bend Central Development Area <br />(10) continued... <br />Mr. King responded that lie is not sure they <br />can do that. As an example, there are 400 <br />people working at Press Gancy. He would <br />want Buxton to verify that there are 0 0 <br />people who work there, where they cone <br />from, their ale, and demo raphics. Will <br />they be able to do that" Mr. cha-111 l <br />responded that they w1fl. If we are going to <br />o all the data gathering ourselves, how <br />HILIC -11 valLie is Buxton going to upp ` <br />Mr. Schalliol responded that as fay- as the data <br />athenn , 01 ce Buxton has the address .for Li. <br />person, they can do the psycho ral:)hlc pro-File <br />of the employee base. <br />Mr. .l Downes expressed concern that <br />employers might not cooperate to prov.1de the <br />information Buxton will rcquire. He asked <br />for some assuran es that Buxton will be able <br />to collect the information. <br />Mr. 1'ec l o ski expressed misralvings about <br />the Ultimate product of the study. PcT 4-6 of <br />Buxton's proposal says they will pair LIs Lip <br />out of the 4500 retail and restaurant profiles <br />in their proprietary database. That loots like <br />an Internet dating serrrxce that we're paying <br />$10,000 for where we'll be paired up with <br />potentlal mates for our retail district. The <br />analogy is tnie,, especially with their <br />proprietary software that they are claiming is <br />on line. What Mr. Pec .o sl x bits problem <br />with is that as with any Internet datili <br />service, we are eventually doing to have to <br />sell ourselves when all is said and clone. <br />1 <br />