My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-20-07 Redevelopment Commission Minutes
sbend
>
Public
>
Redevelopment Commission
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2007
>
04-20-07 Redevelopment Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/16/2008 10:17:25 AM
Creation date
12/11/2007 1:47:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Date
4/20/2007
Document Relationships
04-20-07 Redevelopment Commission Agenda
(Superseded by)
Path:
\Public\Redevelopment Commission\Agendas & Packets\2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
youth fiend edevelop.cnt o.~niss~on <br />.e~~~ar ~eet~ng -Apr~~ ~a, aa~ <br />6. NEW BUSINESS (CONT.) <br />B. Guth ~n~ e~t~r~~ eveop~ne~t Aria <br />{5) continued... <br />tawexceed amaunt of 52~. After be~n~~in <br />~vor~ an the baundar~ ~od~f~eat~ans, <br />ihtn~an Petrie en~neer~ found <br />~.~~.can~patib~e pra~ect~ans of the South fiend <br />~`entra~ and amp~e~~~v~n boundary ~~ne ~ <br />their starting data reu~ting ~n a ~g~~~~.~ea~~t <br />7~1c~"ease ~r~ hour" spe~~t deve~api~~g the ue~ <br />legal deser~pt~a~s~ ~'he South fiend ent~-~~ <br />data vas redone to be calx~patib~e ~v~th the <br />~~r~~p1e~~v~t~g data. ~ght~.a~~ >etr~e leas <br />asked fat• an a~~e~~ded. cantr.ct ~~ tl~.e a~~~o~~nt <br />of ~, to pad for the unforeseen ~ar~~ <br />x-e~~~ired. Staff' reca~n~nends approval . <br />fir. Peez~~o~~vs~~~ asked if the u~or~~ was <br />already done. Nis. Laurent repouded that ~t <br />1 do~~e~ <br />1~:~-. Peczko~vsk~ asked why the ~~~ark v~~~ <br />~~ar~e befog"e tl~e ~'a~~~~~s~oz~ au~harized the <br />add~t~onal fee, ~~n, "what is the point of <br />contracts if eve amend them ~v~lly r~~l~y'?" . <br />Laurent responded that ightn~a~~ ~etr~e <br />performed the work "at risk." The staff <br />tica~ly operates ~n ~ "goad faith'" <br />cnvirantnent. NIs. Laurent acknoleded <br />that another may to h a~~dle the s~tuat~an <br />~ou~d have been for them to stop work unt~~ <br />tl~ey had the on~n~lss~on utl~o~-izat~on far <br />tl~.e additional expenditure. nt~l enough <br />work was done to deter.ine the cause of the <br />problem it couldn't have been l~no~n hove <br />~~~uch tl~ne mould be re~~~~red to eomplcte ~t. <br />ll~. Laurent said that ~t vas her <br />dete~-rninatior~ that this was the reasonable <br />~va~r to proceed. <br />1S <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.