11/24/1980 Board of Public Works Minutes

Home Browse Search

REGULAR MEETING only settlement on the trench. He assured tl area could be checked again with the televis', Young asked if a fence would be constructed t went through. Mr. Hill stated that the city to enter onto private property and erect sucl that he would look at the city -owned portion and have an inspection made. Mrs. June Wessi wondered if the property owner would have to $1,000 of damage if the street caved in as a installation. Mr. McMahon stated that, if t] with the original construction and the sewer responsibility of the contractor. He stated maintenance bond was on file for the project three years, there was any problem which couil faulty construction, the city's Legal Departs matter. Mrs. Wesszo stated that the work dos Meade did not show the sewer taps, but on Phi determine where the taps were by the indentai Mr. McMahon again asked those property owner; ticipate in the sidewalk repair program unde process to notify the Clerk of the Board wit] Mr. McMahon apologized to the property owner.- delays in the sewer construction and stated taking steps in the future to assure that the occur again. Upon a motion made by Mr. McMa] Kernan and carried, the public hearing was ci Roll No. 2985, which was approved by the Boal. was re- confirmed. PUBLIC HEARING - IMPROVEMENT RESOLUTION NO (HAWBAKER STREET SANITARY SEWER PROJECT) This was the date set for holding a public h of sanitary sewers on Hawbaker Street, autho Resolution No. 3501, 1980, adopted by the Bo The Clerk tendered proofs of publication of Bend Tribune and the Tri- County News which w ficient. It was noted that the property own Improvement Resolution had been sent notice the preliminary assessment for the repair wo that the total cost of the project was estim He explained that the city would pay 50% of project was approved. He stated that proper the city for sewer improvements as was done city then prepares an estimate of those cost assessment roll is developed. A public hear determine if the project should proceed. Mr there is not an established health problem i sewer installation would, therefore, be a vo the project would proceed if more than 50% o desired. He stated that, if more than 50% o opposed the project, it would not be authori stated that the Board would allow a two -week to inform the Board of their wishes concerni Mr. Joseph Gosztola, 1318 Roelke Drive, stat property at 742 Ireland Road. He explained recently rezoned for a doctor's office, and that he hook onto the sanitary sewer because concerning the soil in the area. He stated not be used to a great volume. He stated tb other property owners in the area, there wet having some problems with their septic tank that the petition reflected over 50% of the the area. He explained that the Christian C property on Hawbaker Street was in need of s were three or four homes owned by the Center Ray DeRyckere, 644 East Ireland Road, submit NOVEMBER 24, 1980 e residents that the on camera. Mrs. here the new road would not be able a fence. He stated of land in that area o, 1718 Phillipa pay the first result of the sewer .ere was any problem tap, it would be the that a three -year and, if, after the .d be determined as lent would pursue the Le on Prospect and .11ipa, a person could :ion in the ground. who wished to par - the Barrett Law .in a two -week period. for the problems and :hat the city would be :se problems would not Lon, seconded by Mr. .osed and Assessment •d on March 10, 1980, 501, 1980 aring on the construction ized under Improvement rd on November 3, 1980. otice in the South re found to be suf- rs affected by the f the hearing and k. Mr. McMahon noted ted at $47,483.42. he cost if the y owners can petition n this case. The and a preliminary ng is then held to McMahon stated that the area and the untary matter, and the property owners the property owners ed by the Board. He period for the residents .g the sewer project. d that he owned hat the property was t had been suggested of the conditions hat the sewer would .t, in talking with people who were ystems. He stated roperty owners in nter which owned wers and that there in that area. Mr. ed to the Board a r 1 1