Laserfiche WebLink
95 <br />REGULAR MEETING <br />JUNE 25. 1979 <br />on Ireland Road and Hawbaker. He also questioned how much of each <br />property was assessed. Mr, McMahon pointed out that the Barrett <br />Law procedures are set by State Statute and assessments are based <br />on the square footage, or in the event of unplatted land, on a <br />depth of one hundred and fifty feet. He noted that the Board does <br />not have the latitude to adjust this assessment procedure. However, <br />unless the sewer construction is mandated by the Health Department <br />to correct a health hazard, it is voluntary. The Board presents the <br />proposal to the property owners. If 51% of the property owners <br />do not want the project, the Board will not proceed with construction. <br />If 51% of the owners do want the sewer constructed, the City will <br />take bids and the cost of the improvement will be assessed against <br />the affected property owners. The property owner determines whether <br />or not he wishes to hook up to the sewer and this is done at his <br />expense. He can arrange for hook -up at the time of the sewer <br />construction by contracting privately for the hook -up. One tap <br />will be provided for each property. If an owner does not wish to <br />hook up to the sewer immediately, he will be charged the minimum <br />sewage charge. Ray DeRycker, 644 E. Ireland, asked why the church <br />did not hook up to the Fellows Street sewer and leave the other <br />property owners out of this project. David Wells, Manager of the <br />Bureau of Design and Administration, said the church cannot be <br />served by the Fellows Street sewer because they are too high. <br />Arthur Gray, 704 Hawbaker Street, asked whether water could be <br />provided at the same time and Mr. McMahon noted that the owners could <br />petition for the water service separately. John Smith, 626 E. <br />Ireland Road, asked if the Board would be taking action today on the <br />project. Mr. McMahon said the Board would wait to make a decision <br />until the meeting two weeks from today and will ask that all <br />affected property owners contact the Clerk of the Board to make their <br />views known. Those not responding to the Board will be contacted if <br />possible. The matter will be on the agenda for the July 9 meeting <br />of the Board. Mary Lipp, 742 E. Ireland, asked about the method of <br />payment and the interest rate. Mr. McMahon advised her that those <br />who wish may pay the total cost when the construction is completed <br />or may elect to pay it in five equal installments with their <br />property taxes at six per cent interest. Upon motion made by <br />Mr. McMahon, seconded by Mr. Brunner and carried, the public hearing <br />was closed and the Board will take action on the Improvement <br />Resolution at the July 9, 1979 meeting. <br />PUBLIC HEARING ON DENIAL OF TAXI LICENSE - MICHAEL HOWARD <br />This was the date set for a hearing on the denial of a taxi license <br />to Michael Howard, Mr, Howard was present as was Attorney John <br />Roper. Mr. Roper advised the Board that he had reviewed Mr. Howard's <br />driving record and at no time was Mr. Howard involved in any offense <br />that would jeopardize the public safety of citizens of the City of <br />South Bend. A 1972 violation was for "No Registration" and "Failure <br />to have an Inspection Sticker" and was dismissed. A 1974 violation <br />was "No License Plate" for which he was found guilty and paid <br />$5.00 and costs. A 1974 violation was "Hitchhiking" for which he was <br />found guilty and paid $5.00 and costs. A 1977 violation was for <br />"Failure to Have Inspection Sticker" and he was found guilty and <br />paid $5.00 and costs. In 1977, his driver's license was suspended <br />but not because of a moving violation or DUI. He was involved in an <br />auto accident where he was hit from behind and because he did not <br />report it and post bond, his license was suspended. He was driving on <br />the suspended license the next day when he went down to get his car <br />and again had his license suspended. This almost amounted to the same <br />offense. Mr. Roper noted that there were no moving violations and he <br />has had no other accidents and has a good driving record. There is <br />no threat to public safety involved. He asked the Board to reconsider <br />the application for a license because of Mr. Howard's need for a job. <br />