My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-15-10 Redevelopment Commission Minutes
sbend
>
Public
>
Redevelopment Commission
>
Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2010
>
10-15-10 Redevelopment Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/3/2010 9:07:08 AM
Creation date
11/3/2010 9:07:05 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
South Bend Redevelopment Commission <br />Regular Meeting –October 15, 2010 <br /> <br />6. NEW BUSINESS (CONT.) <br /> <br />D. Airport Economic Development Area <br /> <br />(1) continued… <br /> <br />shovel-ready site for new development. The <br />downside is that the site would be a narrow <br />parcel, half a block wide, and because of <br />adjacent uses the reuse would most likely be <br />industrial or heavy commercial. At this <br />point, new development on the parcel is <br />uncertain in the near term. <br /> <br />Option 2: Site Rehabilitation/Site Reuse <br />A site assessment of the building was <br />completed by Wightman Petrie who <br />determined that the structure and foundation <br />of the building was solid, but there were <br />environmental concerns, as well as basic <br />building issues that would need to be <br />addressed before the site could be reused for <br />an industrial use. The building size, <br />especially with the high bay section, appears <br />to be marketable for reuse, but because of the <br />condition of the building and site, much work <br />would need to be done to make the site <br />development ready. Wightman Petrie <br />estimated it would cost approximately <br />$459,800 to clean and rehab the structure and <br />make associated site improvements to the <br />property. The Commission was supplied <br />with a copy of the budget estimate for <br />cleanup. The upside for reuse is that reuse <br />costs would be less than new construction. <br />The downside is that the building dimensions <br />are fixed and some costs for cleanup and <br />rehab might become lost costs for a period of <br />time while the property is on the market. <br /> <br />Recommendation <br />Staff recommends a hybrid approach to the <br /> 16 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.