My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Opening of Proposals - Utility Billing System - Advanced Utility Systems - Part 1
sbend
>
Public
>
Public Works
>
Board of Works Documents
>
2018
>
Opening of Quotations/Proposals
>
Opening of Proposals - Utility Billing System - Advanced Utility Systems - Part 1
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/4/2025 8:40:45 AM
Creation date
1/24/2018 9:10:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board of Public Works
Document Type
Projects
Document Date
1/23/2018
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
64
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
vendors are required to obtain and show proof of upon submission. Please alro clarify if <br />those documents will be counted towards the overall 80 page maximum limit. <br />Answer: All licensing and certification requirements are described in Attachment 3 of <br />the RFP. <br />A1.23 Question: Is the City open to a train the trainer approach, or is fill end user training <br />required? <br />Answer: Vendors shall provide all end -user, technical, and system administrator training <br />as part of the implementation project. <br />A1.24 Question: Currently, what are the estimated number of on-line 311 queries regarding <br />Utility Billing? <br />Answer: The current version of CRM Dynamics does not accommodate online queries. <br />There are approximately 2500 phone calls per month logged by 311 on behalf of the <br />Utility. Not all of those calls result in utility billing system interaction. In addition, <br />numerous customer calls are received directly by utility staff. <br />A1.25 Question: How many clients do you expect to utilize on line payments per month? <br />Answer: There are currently about 6400 online credit card payments a month, <br />which includes both onetime payments and recurring payments. The City expects the <br />number of on-line payments to increase as a result of the new utility billing system. <br />Al .26 Question: Proposal Form D, requirement CSS S requests that the new system "Portal <br />provides the ability to request service, including service connections, transfers, <br />disconnections, etc. " However, Section II "Project Background". Page 1 of 2 in the <br />second to last paragraph states "Portal for Dynamics 36.5 will be the online source for <br />City residents to submit all service requests. " Which approach is the preference of the <br />City? <br />Answer: The City's preference would be to have all service (not billing) functionality, <br />utility and otherwise, in the Dynamics 365 CRM platform. We believe this would be the <br />easiest digital experience for our residents. We understand that this might require <br />custom interfaces or integrations with a CIS and/or a CIS's own online portal <br />functionality. This is our preference, but we understand that many CIS softwares have <br />online portals, some with similar functionality. If a CIS has its own online portal, it is <br />important for us to understand what the CIS's own portal functionality is against the <br />potential functionality of a CIS - Dynamics 365 CRM interface/integration. It is also <br />important to understand the cost difference, if any, between the a CIS's own portal <br />functionality and a CIS - Dynamics 365 CRM interface/integration. <br />Page 5 of 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.