My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
17-75 Special Exception 806 Howard Street
sbend
>
Public
>
Common Council
>
Legislation
>
Upcoming Bills
>
2018
>
01-08-2018
>
17-75 Special Exception 806 Howard Street
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/4/2018 1:55:35 PM
Creation date
1/4/2018 9:24:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council - City Clerk
City Council - Document Type
Resolutions
City Counci - Date
1/8/2018
Bill Number
17-75
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
103
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Area Board of Zoning Appeals—December 6, 2017 <br /> they converted some of the building to warehouse for instance,that has a lower parking calculation then you would for <br /> office. So part of this is warehouse and part of it was office,so it would depend on the makeup of the building. There is <br /> nothing in here that would prevent them from adding up to or remodeling up to a 50' height provided they could meet, <br /> not exceed the 32 spaces previously requested. <br /> MR.CRUMLISH: The original variance? <br /> MRS.SMITH: The original variance in 1992. <br /> MR. URBANSKI:Angela, if someone came in and leveled this building and built another building for office, could they? <br /> Office structure on there providing they do the parking and everything else? <br /> MRS.SMITH: This site if leveled would not be able to be built as an office site with the existing setbacks and the parking <br /> requirements. You would not be able to get an office on this site now because you would not be able to meet the setback <br /> requirements or the parking requirements that would go with any size office on this site. So this site would essentially <br /> become unusable as an office site under our current standards. <br /> MR.URBANSKI: But it could as a residential. <br /> MRS.SMITH: If they rezoned it they could use it residentially. They could not,for instance they could not use this,they <br /> could not level this building and build a house on here without going back through the rezoning process because a single <br /> family residential is not a permitted use. <br /> MR. URBANSKI: Which goes to Area Plan and the Council. <br /> MRS.SMITH: Correct. <br /> MR. LESZCZYNSKI: Then I've got a question and maybe I'm confused. I thought you were going to knock it down and save <br /> this floor... <br /> MR. MURPHY: No,John, it's a steel frame,wood structure. The idea would be to take the exterior walls down and leave <br /> the frame and go up. <br /> MR. LESZCZYNSKI: So you're just leaving the frame and... <br /> MR. MURPHY: And the floor structure,yes. <br /> MR. URBANSKI: If they came in, basically they're going to use two floors,correct? The first floor and second floor for <br /> offices? <br /> MR. MURPHY: That's correct. <br /> MR. URBANSKI: I have no other questions. <br /> MR. LESZCZYSKI: The character of this neighborhood has changed dramatically since 92. So the requirements needed in <br /> 92 they were trying to get anybody they could into the neighborhood and they went down to the 35 spots. <br /> 22 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.