My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
17-75 Special Exception 806 Howard Street
sbend
>
Public
>
Common Council
>
Legislation
>
Upcoming Bills
>
2018
>
01-08-2018
>
17-75 Special Exception 806 Howard Street
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/4/2018 1:55:35 PM
Creation date
1/4/2018 9:24:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council - City Clerk
City Council - Document Type
Resolutions
City Counci - Date
1/8/2018
Bill Number
17-75
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
103
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Area Board of Zoning Appeals—December 6, 2017 <br /> MRS.SMITH: I think one of the challenges that Mr. Urbanski hit on and what you're hitting on as well is when the <br /> Common Council approved this for an office use in 1992 or a commercial use actually, it was C-1 Commercial, even at that <br /> time it was extremely difficult if not impossible for this site to meet the standards with that district at that time which is <br /> what warrant the variances back then.So it kind of goes all the way back to the Common Council's approval in 1991 that <br /> kind of set in this chain of events which is always caution when we look at land use issues is once approved that land use <br /> is approved and therefore it presents challenges going forward. <br /> MR. CRUMLISH: However, in 2004 it was changed to "0"? <br /> MRS.SMITH: Because the commercial designation that was there before was not in line with any of the options within <br /> the district. They actually down zoned it to"0"Office. I suppose they could have made it Local Business or Mixed Use or <br /> any other number of things but they generally in 2004 they were looking at the existing use and I don't know if it was <br /> occupied at that point or not but they were generally looking at the existing use and how to bring it in in a zoning <br /> classification that was the lowest possible to meet that existing use without causing any undue hardship on the property <br /> owner by making them a legal non-conforming use. <br /> MR. URBANSKI: The property directly north across Howard Street,which used to be a restaurant years back, is that,did <br /> that revert, I'm assuming it was Commercial because there was restaurant,did that revert to a residential lot? The vacant <br /> lot that's never been built on. Somebody made comment that that's not for sale. <br /> MR. CRUMLISH: The one across the street? <br /> MR. URBANSKI: Yes. <br /> MRS.SMITH: To the north across Howard? <br /> MR.CRUMLISH: What is that zoned? <br /> MR. URBANSKI: Northwest corner? <br /> MRS.SMITH: Northwest corner? It's the northwest I'm talking about. <br /> MRS.SMITH: Both of the properties, both the northwest corner and the northeast corner, both are zoned"SF2"Single <br /> Family. I'm guessing the northwest corner is a legal non-conforming use. The northwest corner looks like it has multiple <br /> driveways,so I'm guessing it's probably a multi-family dwelling,or multiple sidewalks. <br /> MR. CRUMLISH: It's the Legal Aid Clinic. <br /> MRS. SMITH: If it's the Legal Aid Clinic so it's probably a legal non-conforming use. <br /> MR.CRUMLISH: Does anybody have any knowledge of when the vacant property immediately north,the structure was <br /> razed that was there,was that prior to 1992? <br /> MRS. SMITH: Immediately north must have been razed after 2015 because I'm looking at a 2017 aerial and there's still a <br /> house on it in 2017. <br /> MR. CRUMLISH: I guess I'm referring to... <br /> 23 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.