My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
17-75 Special Exception 806 Howard Street
sbend
>
Public
>
Common Council
>
Legislation
>
Upcoming Bills
>
2018
>
01-08-2018
>
17-75 Special Exception 806 Howard Street
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/4/2018 1:55:35 PM
Creation date
1/4/2018 9:24:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council - City Clerk
City Council - Document Type
Resolutions
City Counci - Date
1/8/2018
Bill Number
17-75
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
103
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Area Board of Zoning Appeals—December 6, 2017 <br /> neighborhood. Again I'll remind the Board the height really isn't in consideration. I think the neighbors understand that. <br /> As a combined request the Board will make a recommendation on the upper storage dwelling unit. I looked and verified <br /> in the resolution that was prepared for the Council,that is the only use listed as a Special Exception Use and it is a singular <br /> use so its single unit is the only thing that could be allowed under that resolution if adopted by the Common Council. <br /> None of the other residential types would be,that are listed as a Special Exception Use,such as multifamily,or anything <br /> like that would be allowed without coming back before the Board. As I mentioned before we are looking at the ordinance <br /> changes and if this were not to go forward now that they could reapply after those ordinance changes came in. But those <br /> are things that we are already considering that once a building is already there the setbacks are kind of established,the <br /> use has already been established and therefore our recommendation remains the same. <br /> MR.CRUMLISH: Thank you. <br /> MR. URBANSKI: I'd like to ask the petitioner a question. In doing your studies and looking at this property along with the <br /> perspective developers. Looking up and down Notre Dame Avenue, I'm just talking about that St. Peter, height wise, <br /> approximately,a lot of the structures are high, 10/8, 10/10, 10/12, 12/12 pitches which are high, approximately how <br /> higher do you feel that this is going to be or have you done any comparison of what's up and down the Avenue, Notre <br /> Dame Avenue. <br /> MR. MURPHY: Well Notre Dame Avenue by and large are four story structures,we're only proposing three. We're <br /> thinking... <br /> LOUD OUTBURST FROM THE AUDIENCE ABOUTTHAT STATEMENT <br /> MR. CRUMLISH: The public session is not open. <br /> MR. MURPHY: Excuse me, I thought you were referring to Eddy Street Commons, not Notre Dame Avenue. Talking about <br /> houses on Notre Dame Avenue? <br /> MR. URBANSKI: Yes. <br /> MR. MURPHY: I don't have that. I do have a reference for the house to the south,the Mustillios house,the ridge is at <br /> 27.8' and that was shot by Abonmarche. <br /> MR. URBANSKI: And what is this ridge approximately, sir? <br /> MR. MURPHY: This ridge is about 48'. <br /> MR. URBANSKI:So we're about 20'over. <br /> MR. MURPHY: That's correct. <br /> MS. SCHUTH: Angela I wanted to verify with you a comment that was made that if a third story office was added to the <br /> existing building, if that would also bring these variances back in front or the Board? <br /> MRS.SMITH: It would depend on the configuration of the building. They could add a third story to this building and <br /> provided their parking calculations does not change beyond what was approved before, so if they came up with, whatever <br /> Configuration the building came up with a calculation of 32 spaces more or less they could go ahead and add on. So say <br /> 21 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.