Laserfiche WebLink
St. Joseph County Housing Consortium <br />the public comment periods will be answered as if they were received on the last day of the <br />comment period to allow consideration of all complaints together. <br />Changes to Plan/Annual Action Plan -This Citizen Participation Plan will be reviewed <br />annually for updating and possible revision. All comments received are considered for <br />implementation for the current year's Plan. Written comments should be directed to: St. <br />Joseph County Housing Consortium, 1200 County-City Building, and South Bend, IN 46601. <br />Any substantial changes (changes in funding of more than $30,000, cancellation or addition <br />of any program, substantial change in the location of any program or project) in the Annual <br />Action Plan of the Final HCD Plan will be made only after proposed revisions to the HCD Plan <br />and proposed ordinances are made available to the public; a public hearing is held; and a <br />30 day public comment period (unless a shorter time period shall be permitted by HUD) is <br />offered to allow citizens to comment on the changes. <br />Summary of Comments on Investment Portion of 2010-2014 HCD Plan (2010 Annual Action <br />Plan - <br />jTo be completed after end of public comment period.] <br />For comments made on subsequent Annual Action Plans (for years 2011-2014) see the <br />Annual Action Plan sections for those years attached as Appendices when they are <br />developed. <br />Summary of Comments on Amendment(s~ to 2010-2014 HCD Plan -See Amendments as <br />attached to this Plan. <br />Summary of Comments on Draft 2010-2014 Housing & Community Development Plan -The <br />Draft Plan was available for comment from July 22 through August 10, 2009. During that <br />time period, the following comments, summarized below, were received. <br />Five people attended the July 22, 2009, public hearing held at the Community Development <br />Offices in South Bend. The conversation addressed the process for application of funds and <br />the intent of the use of funds. As part of this discussion, one individual expressed concern <br />that the Plan, in its Anti-Poverty section, did not adequately commit to providing a <br />guarantee of employment for those individuals that are the lowest of income. There was <br />discussion on the requirements of Section 3 for both South Bend and Mishawaka. The <br />discussion focused on the fact that if the federal funds were not committing to employment <br />for those very low income people, then the ability of those individuals to be productive <br />citizens was compromised. The suggestion was made that even though sub-grantee <br />contracts require Section 3 compliance, not enough very low income people were being <br />employed. <br />Another citizen reviewed the DRAFT Plan and made the following comments: <br />• On-site monitoring of sub-grantees should be completed more often than every two <br />years. <br />• Suggested a plan be created by a neighborhood committee who would then oversee <br />funding to reputable landlords who would acquire, upgrade and restore homes. <br />• Disagreed with statement that one doesn't know which homes are public housing and <br />that the public housing authority homes should blend in more with the neighborhood. <br />• PHA Section 8 inspectors need better training; they should not be looking for minor <br />infractions but concentrate on overall quality and condition of the home. <br />2010-2014 Housing and Community Development Plan 17 <br />