My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12/16/1981 Board of Public Works Minutes
sbend
>
Public
>
Public Works
>
Minutes
>
1981
>
12/16/1981 Board of Public Works Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/15/2024 2:36:01 PM
Creation date
11/2/2016 11:34:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board of Public Works
Document Type
Minutes
Document Date
12/14/1981
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
REGULAR MEETING DECEMBER 14, 1981 <br />concerning what the city intended to do with the money it would <br />be receiving from the Ashland Chemical lawsuit and from Miles <br />Laboratories for treatment of certain waste products. Mr. Kernan <br />stated that apparently Mr. DaCosta felt that money could be used <br />to finance the 1982 budget and the city's appeal for excess tax <br />levy should be reduced. Mr. Kernan pointed out that Mr. DaCosta <br />has by his action made representation to a governmental agency <br />with incorrect facts. He stated that the money the city would <br />be receiving as a result of the Ashland Chemical lawsuit was a <br />settlement to be used to reimburse the costs incurred by the <br />city's Water Works Department; and the contract with Miles <br />Laboratories provided payment for the treatment of certain <br />wastes, which funds would be put toward eliminating the deficit <br />at the plant. He emphasized that these funds could not be used <br />for property tax supported funds. Mr. Hill further explained <br />that, in the Ashland matter, to suggest that the city made a <br />profit was totally incorrect. He stated that the city has <br />already exceeded the settlement figure of $640,000 in costs <br />incurred; which he estimated to be $730,000. He stated that the <br />�. correct figures have always been available for public inspection <br />�. and the city had not at any time misrepresented those expenditures. <br />He itemized those expenditures which totalled $730,000. <br />APPROVE CHANGE ORDER NO. 3 - INTERIOR FINISHES (FIRST BANK CENTER) <br />Mr. Leszczynski stated that Change Order No. 3 in the amount of <br />an increase of $465.94 on behalf of Interior Finishes for its <br />portion of work on the First Bank Center Project had been <br />submitted for Board approval. He advised that the change order <br />would revise the total contract cost to date to $151,294.94, and <br />said change order had been approved by the architect, construction <br />manager and Mr. Patrick McMahon. Upon a motion made by Mr. Kernan, <br />seconded by Mr. Hill and carried, the above change order was <br />approved. <br />APPROVE CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 (FINAL) AND PROJECT COMPLETION <br />AFFIDAVIT - RIETH-RILEY CONSTRUCTION (POLICE SUBSTATION PARKING LOTS) <br />Mr. Leszczynski advised that Rieth-Riley Construction had <br />submitted Change Order No. 1 (final) in the amount of a decrease <br />of $282.55 for the paving of parking lots at the police substations <br />on Frances Street and at Fire Station No. 4. He stated that the <br />revised contract total was $31,945.45. Also submitted for Board <br />action was the Project Completion Affidavit for the project <br />indicating a three-year maintenance for the work done to <br />December 14, 1984. Upon a motion made by Mr. Kernan, seconded <br />by Mr. Hill and carried, the change order and project completion <br />affidavit were approved and the maintenance bond filed. <br />ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION NO. 27, 1981 - RENEWALS <br />OF SCRAP DEALERS' LICENSES <br />RESOLUTION NO. 27. 1981 <br />WHEREAS, license renewal applications for scrap and junk <br />dealers for the year 1982 have been received by the Board <br />of Public Works; and <br />WHEREAS, inspections of the properties have been completed <br />by the Neighborhood Code Enforcement Office and the Fire <br />Prevention Bureau as required by Ordinance No. 6998-81; and <br />WHEREAS, the Neighborhood Code Enforcement Office and the <br />Fire Prevention Bureau have found that no code violations <br />exist on the properties; and <br />WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 6998-81 required approval of a Resolu- <br />tion of the Board of Public Works authorizing the renewal of <br />the license applications. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.