My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11/16/1981 Board of Public Works Minutes
sbend
>
Public
>
Public Works
>
Minutes
>
1981
>
11/16/1981 Board of Public Works Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/15/2024 2:36:34 PM
Creation date
11/2/2016 11:14:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board of Public Works
Document Type
Minutes
Document Date
11/16/1981
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
229 <br />REGULAR MEETING <br />NOVEMBER 16, 1981 <br />which were duly licensed; however, during the peak demand times <br />during the day, no more than 25-30 cabs were on the street at <br />any one time. He felt that number adequately reflected and <br />satisfied the need for cab service within the city. He <br />indicated that the ordinance requires that anyone who is <br />issued a Certificate of Public Convenience must maintain and <br />keep an office open 24 hours a day and must be able to provide <br />cab service 24 hours a day. He asked that evidence be supplied <br />to the Board guaranteeing that that stipulation would be complied <br />with by Mr. Thompson and the Roseland Cab Company. Mr. Hill <br />stated that Roseland Cab presently had 2 vehicles which it was <br />operating. He advised that Independent Cab had 3 vehicles and <br />had furnished the Board with a supplementary note indicating <br />that 2 of those vehicles would be in service. He stated that <br />the Board would, therefore be considering only the addition of <br />4 vehicles to provide cab service over and above that already <br />provided by Yellow Cab and Courtesy Cab. Mr. Butler wondered <br />if Mr. Thompson and the Roseland Cab Company currently had valid <br />licenses. Mr. Kernan stated that some licenses had been issued <br />as far back as seven or eight years ago, and it was determined <br />�. recently that a Certificate of Public Convenience had never been <br />filed with the Board. He explained that there were some questions <br />raised as to the licensing procedure as a result of this. He <br />stated that, in cases where a license had been issued and the <br />�( Certificate of Public Convenience not filed, all insurance <br />requirements had been met. He advised that Independent Cab <br />Company had been operating for about 14-15 years with a license; <br />however, the Certificate of Public Convenience had not been <br />obtained. In the case of Roseland Cab, Mr. Kernan explained <br />that, while they are located outside the city limits, they are <br />utilizing city streets and handling most of the cab service to <br />and from the airport which was recently annexed to the city. <br />He felt that, because of this, Roseland Cab should obtain a <br />Certificate of Public Convenience. Mrs. Pfotenhauer addressed <br />Mr. Butler's question concerning the 24-hour service and office. <br />She stated that each holder of a license is required to keep a <br />central place of business open for 24 hours a day. Mr. Butler <br />stated that there were only two companies that complied with <br />the 24-hour service requirement, and they were the current <br />holders of valid licenses: Yellow Cab and Courtesy Cab. He <br />stated that, if the Board approved the certificates of Grady <br />Thompson and Roseland Cab, those companies should be required <br />to abide by all sections of the ordinance dealing with the cab <br />companies, including inspection of vehicles, etc. Mr. Don <br />Heilman, a driver for Courtesy Cab stated that, at one time, <br />Courtesy Cab had 18 cabs on the street, but at present they <br />were down to 10 cabs and many times those cabs were not in <br />service. He wondered about the need for additional cab service <br />in view of that. Mrs. Thompson advised the Board that her <br />husband operated a 24-hour service at 1392 Birdsell Street. <br />Mr. Hill stated that the points raised were well taken and, <br />if the two major operators of cabs in the city were in compliance <br />with the code, all other operators would also be expected to comply. <br />He felt the issue was a question of public convenience and the <br />fact that some of the existing cabs were not always in operation <br />should not affect the public convenience issue. He stated that <br />two small companies have been operating with an invalid license, <br />and the Board was merely trying to bring them within compliance. <br />He stated that, if they do not comply, they will lose the right <br />to operate entirely. He felt that, if the Board was dealing <br />with another major carrier which would be operating 30 to 40 <br />additional cabs, the Board would be dealing with different <br />criteria. He advised that, until the appropriate certificates <br />of insurance were filed as required and documentation is provided <br />that a 24-hour service is available and all other requirements <br />are met, the certificates for Independent Cab and Roseland Cab <br />would not be approved. Mr. Butler stated that the ordinance <br />provided that the Board must find that additional cab service <br />is required and not that the awarding of additional licenses <br />would adversely impact the public convenience as Mr. Hill had <br />stated. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.