Laserfiche WebLink
REGULAR MEETING DECEMBER 17. 1990 <br />411 <br />1 <br />There being no one else present wishing to speak either for or <br />against the proposed alley vacation and no written objections <br />having been filed with the Board, upon a motion made by Mr. <br />Leszczynski, seconded by Mrs. DeClercq and carried, the Public <br />Hearing on this matter was closed. <br />Mr. Leszczynski advised that the Area Plan Commission has <br />recommended that the alley not be vacated. Additionally, the <br />Engineering Department has noted that the City has no sewers in <br />this alley and that they find no reason for denial, conditional <br />on receiving the perpetual non-exclusive easement agreement. <br />Also, the Department of Economic Development has no objection to <br />the vacation. <br />Mr. Leszczynski noted that this property will be placed on the <br />tax rolls and that the Petitioner will pave and maintain the <br />vacated portion of the alley including snow removal. Mr. <br />Leszczynski noted that this type of situation exists in several <br />places around town. <br />In response to an inquiry of who would accept the easement should <br />the alley be vacated, Board Attorney Jenny Pitts Manier noted <br />that the Common Council would probably make the easement a <br />condition of the vacation and it is the Board of Public Works <br />that would accept the easement. <br />Therefore, Ms. Humphreys made a motion that the Clerk forward to <br />the Common Council a favorable recommendation on this proposed <br />alley vacation subject to the Petitioner and the Legal Department <br />drafting an easement back to the City. Mrs. DeClercq seconded <br />the motion which carried. <br />ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 36-1990 - DISPOSAL OF OBSOLETE VEHICLE (FIRE <br />DEPARTMENT) <br />In a letter to the Board, Fire Chief Luther Taylor requested <br />permission to declare a vehicle obsolete as it was totalled and <br />it needs to be declared obsolete so they can release the vehicle <br />to the insurance company for payment. Therefore, Mrs. DeClercq <br />made a motion that the Resolution as submitted be adopted. Ms. <br />Humphreys seconded the motion which carried and the following <br />Resolution No. 36-1990 was adopted: <br />A RESO <br />ON DI <br />RESOLUTION NO. 36-1990 <br />UTION OF THE SOUTH BEND BOARD OF PUBLIC WORK.q <br />)SAL OF UNFIT AND/OR <br />PROPERTY <br />WHEREAS, it has been determined by the Board of Public Works <br />that the following property is unfit for the purpose for which it <br />was intended and is no longer needed by the City of South Bend: <br />ONE (1) 1983 CHEVY S10 <br />VIN. #1GCCS14B9D2131267 <br />WHEREAS, Indiana Code 36-1-11-6(c) permits and establishes <br />procedure for disposal of personal property which is unfit for <br />the purpose for which it was intended and which is no longer <br />needed by the City. <br />NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Board of Public Works <br />of the City of South Bend that the one (1) item listed above is <br />no longer <br />needed by the City; is unfit for the purpose for which it was <br />intended; and has an estimated total value of less than Five <br />Hundred Dollars ($500.00). <br />BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said property may be transferred <br />