Laserfiche WebLink
HEALTH & PUBLIC SAFETY APRIL 7, 2016 5:00 P.M. <br />Committee Members Present: John Voorde, Karen White, Oliver Davis, Jo Broden <br />Other Council Present: Regina Williams- Preston <br />Others Present: Kathleen Cekanski - Farrand, Jennifer Coffinan, Alkeyna <br />Aldridge <br />Agenda: Bill No. 05 -16 Approving fees for nuisance abatement <br />Bill No. 06 -16 Approving fees for securing and demolishing <br />structures <br />Councilmember John Voorde, Chair of the Health & Public Safety Committee, called the <br />meeting to order at 5:08 p.m. with two bills for consideration. <br />Chairperson Voorde explained that the committee was meeting to consider Bills No. 05 -16 and <br />06 -16, but received an email saying that both bills would be withdrawn, but they are not <br />officially withdrawn so far. There is some question of whether or not the council needs to be <br />involved at all, and Chairperson Voorde is of the opinion that the Council does need to be <br />involved because it is the Council that can impose a fee or a penalty. Those fees and penalties <br />would then be codified and made public record. Prior to it coming to the Committee, the Board <br />of Public Works got involved, and Randy Wilkerson told the Board that they haven't raised fees <br />since 2008, here's a new schedule that ought to be done. The Board of Public Works then works <br />as a recommending body to the Council. In this case, they agreed with the department head and <br />sent both bills to the Council with a favorable recommendation. <br />Several councilmembers have asked the question how did the City justify this rate schedule or <br />these increases. There is no record in the minutes of the Board of Public Works meeting that any <br />justification was given. The minutes say that Randy Wilkerson made the proposal, and Gary <br />Gilot, who is on the Board of Public Works said that the fees sounded reasonable and then they <br />sent a favorable recommendation. <br />Committee Member Karen White asked if the Board of Public Works takes action on the fee <br />recommendation. Council Attorney Cekanski - Farrand stated that the action was taken last <br />November. <br />Committee Member Jo Broden explained the minutes from the November agenda review session <br />from the Board of Public Works. She read a section of the minutes, then explained that Gary <br />Gilot stated that the Board of Public Works recommends fees to the Council, and the State Board <br />of Accounts requires the Council to approve all fee setting. <br />In the November 24`h meeting minutes, they referenced resolutions that were given favorable <br />recommendations. <br />