Laserfiche WebLink
Health and Public Safety Committee <br />February 19, 2009 <br />Page 2 <br />Council Member Whtie then called upon Jeremy Toschlog, an MSW Intern at IU South <br />Bend to give a report. <br />Mr. Toschlog stated that he has researched what many other communities have done <br />which primarily focus on instituting watch group programs. He focused on Plano, Texas <br />which has neighborhood watch groups; cities in Missouri which has state laws which <br />permit four (4) types of tax credits for businesses located in high crime areas; and San <br />Diego, California which have reduced crime by getting neighbors more engaged. He noted <br />that continued interaction and collaboration were key to reducing crime. <br />Council Member White stated that from 01-01-2007 to 01-11-09 there were 1,046 calls for <br />service to Beacon Heights. The calls have been listed by code, with many repeat calls <br />being for noise, domestic, etc. She hoped that these calls will be broken down by code <br />category to give a better assessment, with this being completed in a week. <br />Council Member Henry Davis, Jr., apologized for being tardy. He stated that he <br />appreciates having the four (4) representatives from Beacon Heights present today. He is <br />hoping that there will be transparent communication since he believes that change is <br />critical to fostering growth in the area. He sees Beacon Heights "like a sore spot"; and that <br />today's meeting is to find out how the city can be of help. He noted that he works closely <br />with the Steering Committee seeking retail in this area; and is glad that communications <br />are now open. <br />Council Member White called upon the Council Attorney to give a summary of local laws. <br />Mrs. Cekanski-Farrand stated that since 1990 the city has had a local ordinance which is <br />found in the South Bend Municipal Code as Section 13-57.1, and was initially sponsored <br />by then 1St District Council Member Steve Luecke. The ordinance provides for: <br />• A "First Response Notice" to be issued by the responding police officer to the <br />person in charge if there is a threat to public health, safety health or general welfare <br />• A "Disturbance Violation Fee Notice" to be issued if the police officer returns to the <br />same location which is considered a "special security assignment" where the city <br />can charge the responsible party for personnel & equipment costs or other damage <br />and expenses incurred as a result of the disturbance; as well as a fine of $250 <br />• If the "person in charge" cannot be identified the owner of the location would be <br />issued all notices and fines <br />• All costs are paid to the Ordinance Violations Bureau and then deposited into the <br />Law Enforcement Continuing Education Fund <br />She noted that this is not an exclusive remedy for such disturbances. <br />