Laserfiche WebLink
REGULAR MEETING OCTOBER 27, 2008 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />and 2009 assessed valuations to finalize actual dollars to be but in 2009. Planning <br />Sessions over next 4-6 months to identify critical city services and to review draft <br />spending reduction plans presented by departments during summer of 2008. Prioritize <br />spending over 2009. Realize that some differences can be made by moving expenditures <br />to other funds such as current income tax fund or foregoing capital expenditure dollars <br />but long-term solutions must be identified. Work on prioritizing long-term spending <br />stnd <br />plans and goals as more information becomes available during 1 and 2 quarter of 2009. <br />Ms. Fanello stated that this will take a team effort between administration, Council and <br />departments. She noted that she would like to spend two whole days with Council <br />reviewing. <br /> <br />This being the time heretofore set for the Public Hearing on the above bill, proponents <br />and opponents were given an opportunity to be heard. <br /> <br />Councilmember Puzzello stated that she is aware of some departments that have already <br />laid-off personnel and consolidated jobs. She questioned what the cost savings is to date. <br /> <br />Ms. Fanello stated that she only knows of her department that has made cuts and will take <br />effect January 1, 2009. She stated that not a lot has been done. She noted that the <br />departments have held off hiring full time personnel. She stated that she will ask the <br />departments to make a list of their priorities and submit them to the Council. <br /> <br />Mayor Luecke asked Councilmember Puzzello from what base line in terms of the <br />savings from. He stated that there have been a lot of savings generated over the past <br />several years. Obviously they are facing additional savings that need to be done. He <br />questioned whether she was looking at savings from 2008 looking at 2009 budget or 2007 <br />as a baseline year. <br /> <br />Councilmember Puzzello stated that she is interested in looking at 2009. <br /> <br />Mayor Luecke stated that there are some that are in the 2009 budget already and can <br />quantify that, some of the other spending plan proposals that were referenced have not <br />been implemented yet. So there is not a cost savings to those strategies. <br /> <br />Ms. Fanello stated that they will have the information regarding cell phones and take <br />home cars, but as far as some of the big stuff, they still need to finalize the big stuff. <br /> <br />Councilmember Varner stated regarding the capital budget and there not being a capital <br />budget. That they were talking about the general fund and that there is a capital budget <br />along with a number of other funds. <br /> <br />Ms. Fanello stated that there was not a lot of large capital items done this year, however <br />the sewer department is obviously operating under a bond. <br /> <br />Councilmember Varner stated that when they talk about possible solutions, that they look <br />at pilots or payments in lieu of taxes from not-for-profits who occupy a large portion <br />within the corporate limits of the City of South Bend. They provide county-wide <br />employment but they don’t provide a lot of dollars that support general government for <br />police and fire. He stated that the Hotel-Motel Tax needs to be increased. He stated that <br />when he travels around and sees how much more other areas are charging 15 to 18%. In <br />South Bend we are only charging 6%. Each percent if $500,000 under the current billing. <br />He also stated that on the sales of tickets, such as the University of Notre Dame Football <br />Games, which is a transaction, it is not taxing the University; it is taxes the persons <br />involved in the transaction. It could generate several million dollars. He stated that he <br />knows that the State needs to help the local municipalities by including them in some of <br />the profits from the sales tax. Also there needs to be some creative use of TIF <br />assessments. There are numerous dollars growing in TIF Districts and they should be <br />used where they need to use them. Not necessarily for of the proposals that have come <br />forward as he has seen. He stated that help needs to come from the State Legislature, <br />they put the cities and towns in this situation and they can certainly help get them out. <br />He stated that he doesn’t think that it is unreasonable to make those requests. <br /> 20 <br /> <br />