Laserfiche WebLink
REGULAR MEETING OCTOBER 27, 2008 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Councilmember Puzzello made a motion to reconsider Bill Nos. 58-08; 59-08 and 60-08 <br />to allow for Public Hearing. Councilmember Oliver Davis seconded the motion which <br />carried by a voice vote of eight (8) ayes. <br /> <br />Councilmember Oliver Davis made a motion to combine Bill Nos. 58-08; 59-08 and 60- <br />08 for purposes of Public Hearing. Councilmember LaFountain seconded the motion <br />which carried by a voice vote of eight (8) ayes. <br /> <br />th <br />Mayor Stephen Luecke, 14 Floor County-City Building, 227 W. Jefferson Blvd., South <br />th <br />Bend, Indiana, and Catherine Fanello, City Controller, 12 Floor County-City Building, <br />227 W. Jefferson Blvd., South Bend, Indiana, made the presentation for these bills. <br /> <br />Mayor Luecke advised that due to an advertising error in Administration & Finance, the <br />2009 budget must be heard again for Public Hearing. <br /> <br />Catherine Fanello, City Controller gave an update on local statistics. Unemployment <br />6.8% as of September 2008 compared to 4.4% as of September 2007. She noted that they <br />will have to see the effect on income tax distributions in future. She noted food prices up <br />6.1% as of September 2008 as compare to September 2007, and the overall consumer <br />price index up 4.9 % in September 2008 as compared to September 2007. She noted that <br />the Circuit Breaker affects only 3 funds: General, Park and Cumulative Capital <br />Development, but it puts pressure on other funds to try and cover costs such as income <br />tax funds. She stated that income tax dollars not budgeted for 2009 are $3.4 million. She <br />stated that the caps will be phased in beginning in 2009 homeowner’s 1.5% in 2009 and <br />1.0% in 2010; Rental Property 2.5% in 2009 and 2.0% in 2010 and Business 3.5% in <br />2009 and 3.0% in 2010. She noted that the percentages are based upon grossed assessed <br />value. She noted income tax revenue history in 2008 at an estimate by the Department of <br />Local Government Finance the estimated Revenue is $6,266,381 and subject to <br />fluctuation during economic ups and downs. She noted that income tax funds have been <br />mainly used for capital & debt expenditures and not salaries/benefits that have <br />compounding effects. The fund does not grow fast enough to keep up with compounding <br />salaries/benefit costs. The 2009 Budget Compared to 2008 (Adopted) Citywide in 2009 <br />$180,474,617 and in 2008 $187,225,253; General Fund $67,225,547 in 2009 and <br />$67,300,000 in 2008; Park Fund $11,841,678 and $12,676,555 in 2008. Budget have <br />been dept at or below 2008 adopted budgets. She noted that the 2009 Budget General <br />Fund for Public Safety is $51.6 m or 76.8%; Engineering Streets $6.20 or 9.2%; Code <br />Enforcement $2.32 or 3.4%; General Government $4.44 or 6.6%; Arts/Culture $1.69 or <br />2.5%; Community & Economic Development $.98 or 1.5% for a total of $67.23 million. <br />The 2009 Budget for Salaries and Benefits Citywide are $95.48 million or 53%; General <br />Fund $52.69 million or 78.4% and Parks $7.74 million or 65.3%. Health Insurance Costs <br />Citywide are $9.8 million; General Fund $5.9 million; and Park Fund $918,523. Ms. <br />Fanello noted that the City currently contributes between 85% and 87%. She stated that <br />reducing the budget often equals cutting personnel and benefits. She stated that they are <br />currently looking at four (4) day workweeks (32 hours) for non-bargaining personnel in <br />General Fund could save approximately $950,000 if a 32-hour work week was <br />implemented. This option will not work for all departments and is not an option the <br />majority of employees can live with. They need 40 hour work weeks to sustain their <br />households. They have also looked at an increase in employee share of health insurance <br />and layoffs. She stated that in the 2009 budget the City must maintain debt obligations. <br />Continue to identify costs that can be reduced outside of personnel/benefits. She further <br />noted that updates to the Council on cost reductions that take place over the next couple <br />of months will be prepared in early January. She stated that they are still looking at the <br />City’s cell phone and take home car policy. They will be working to extend current tax <br />warrants or issue new warrants in anticipation that any significant revenue won’t be <br />received by December 31, 2008. In 2005, the City paid $179,300 in interest; 2006, <br />$84,747 and in 2007 $376,928 for a total over a 3 year period of $640,975. She noted <br />that she would like to be able to have that back. Ms. Fanello noted that departments will <br />continue to work to provide further cost detail of department activities/services. They <br />will verify cost of activity/service and examine how each activity fits within Mayor and <br />Council priorities and goals. They will review performance based budget material to <br />provide answers and further detail. She stated what is next? They need 2008 tax rates <br /> 19 <br /> <br />