Laserfiche WebLink
REGULAR MEETING JULY 24, 1972 <br />REGULAR MEETING - RECONVENED <br />Be it remembered that the Common Council of the City of South Bend, Indiana reconvened in the <br />Council Chambers of the County -City Building on Monday, July 24, 1972 at 11 :47 p.m., Council <br />President Peter J. Nemeth presiding. <br />REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE ON MINUTES <br />Your committee on the inspection and supervision of minutes would respectfully report that they <br />have inspected the minutes of the July 10 regular meeting of the Council and found them correct. <br />They, therefore, recommend that the same be approved. <br />/s/ Peter J. Nemeth <br />/s/ Terry S. Miller <br />Upon motion made by Councilman Serge, seconded by Councilman Parent, and carried, the report was <br />accepted as read and placed on file. <br />CITIZENS REQUESTS - MISCELLANEOUS MATTERS <br />Mrs. Pat Forhan, President of the local Chapter of the Women's Political Caucus, said that she <br />would like to know how the Council can say they have not cut salaries of secretaries, stenograph- <br />ers and clerks. The maximum salaries are all lower than the present salaries in some classifi- <br />cations. She said she did not see how it would be possible for all the present secretaries, <br />stenographers and clerks to be moved up to the maximum salary range. This move is discriminatory <br />against women as no men's jobs were included in the range. Councilman Taylor said that there was <br />a need for job evaluation. The minimum for Secretary I is lower but they have raised the maximum. <br />The Council is facing a 92 million dollar total budget and they feel there is a great need for <br />some evaluation of salaries. Councilman Miller said that under the maximum salary range some <br />secretaries will get a greater raise and that the ordinance will provide more flexibility which <br />is what the Council is striving for. Constance Green, 3222 Dunham Street, spoke to protest the <br />Council's action in setting minimum and maximum salary ranges for some positions. She said that <br />the Council was setting this salary range on the assumption that the city will revamp and evalu- <br />ate their employees. She asked where the extra money will go, and would any of this money go to <br />the newly created offices of Director of Human Resources and Director of Public Safety. Council- <br />man Nemeth said that budget cuts will be made to fund the salaries of these two directors. <br />Councilman Taylor said that if the administration chooses to go to the maximum salary, everyone <br />has a chance to get a raise. Mrs. Green then referred to the chart displayed earlier by the <br />Women's Political Caucus and questioned several positions where the maximum salary in the range <br />was less than the position now pays. Councilman Miller said that it would be possible for a <br />secretary to have a change to a higher classification and thereby get a raise. Mrs. Green asked <br />if each employee will be given a just evaluation of her ability in this ordinance. Councilman <br />Nemeth said this ordinance would not provide for job evaluation but the mayor has obtained a <br />federal grant to provide funds to do the evaluating. Mrs. Lee Swan, 2022 Swygart Street, spoke <br />to the Council about the proposed changes in the Riley- Jackson High School boundaries. She gave <br />figures showing which South Bend schools are integrated and which are segregated. She said the <br />housing patterns place 79% of low income housing units on one side of town, and that these hous- <br />ing patterns cause a high rate of black enrollment in a few of the schools with many schools <br />having no black enrollment at all. Councilman Parent thanked Mrs. Swan for her remarks and said <br />that, at some point, the Council ought to take a look at this matter. Mr. Kenneth Buhle, of the <br />Teamsters Union, said that the Council had said the minimum - maximum salary range provides an <br />option for the administration to reward girls by moving them up to another classification. He <br />asked what happens to the girls who are already in the Secretary, Stenographer and Clerk IV <br />classifications and wondered how they could be reclassified. He said it is his understanding <br />employees can only be moved up in classification when a vacancy occurs. Councilman Parent <br />said that he agrees the ordinance is indirectly discriminatory but feels that setting a range is <br />not that important. Mr. Paul Boehm, 317 Rue Gauguin, said that with a different terminology <br />being used in job classifications, what happens to new positions in the budget. Councilman Miller <br />said that they are to be as presented in the proposal. Mrs. Esther Gross, 1704 Woodmont Drive, an <br />employee of the Utilities Department, voiced her objections to the minimum - maximum rantes. She <br />said that in the Utilities Department those secretaries and clerks in the lower paying positions <br />should receive more than a 4% increase. She said that it would not be possible to give all the <br />girls a change in classification as there are not that many jobs in Class Four and what do you <br />give those who are already in Class Four? Councilman Miller said that the classifications could <br />be changed,in the budget presentation. Mrs. Gross asked Mr. Miller if this meant you could add <br />Class 5 and Class 6. Councilman Miller asked Mrs. Gross how many girls she needed at a $5600 <br />salary. Mrs. Gross replied that evidently the Council wanted her to put all the girls in the <br />$5600 classification. <br />REPORT FROM THE URBAN REDEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE <br />Councilman Parent, Chairman of the Urban Redevelopment Committee, made a report as follows: <br />Meeting July 6, 1972 <br />RE: Gasoline Station Study <br />"The Committee members present recommend to the Council that a letter requesting the <br />gasoline station study as outlined in the resolution be approved and sent to the <br />Area Plan Commission. The resolution .should be struck from the record. A draft <br />of a letter to send to the Area Plan Commission is attached to this report." <br />Councilman Parent made a motion that the Council accept the Committee report and the recommenda- <br />tion as to the resolution referred to therein. Councilman Taylor seconded the motion and it was <br />carried. <br />RE: East Side, St. Joseph River <br />"The Committee members present discussed the report from the Area Plan Commission staff <br />concerning the development of the East Side of the St. Joseph River, especially the <br />section which relates directly to the proposed Civic and Cultural Center. The dis- <br />cussion focused on the need for public control of land use in said area. <br />