Laserfiche WebLink
REGULAR MEETING JULY 24, 1972 <br />COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING (CONTINUED) <br />I am currently awaiting an Attorney General opinion on this matter <br />and feel confident that my position will be upheld. <br />Sincerely, <br />/s/ Charles A. Sweeney, Jr. <br />Charles A. Sweeney, Jr. <br />City Attorney <br />CAS: eh <br />Councilman Miller then gave the majority report of the Committee on Fees and Salaries. He said <br />they were making an exception in some classifications, as set forth in the copy of the ordinance <br />provided to the clerk. This would allow clerks, secretaries and stenographers to be assigned to <br />a class commensurate with their ability. City Attorney Charles A. Sweeney, Jr. said that it was <br />his opinion that the Council could not set minimum and maximum salaries but must set a given <br />salary for a given job. The budget classifications accomplish this purpose. Mr. Sweeney said <br />that he would caution the Council to hesitate before fixing salaries on a range basis. Council- <br />man Miller said that the minimum and maximum rates were being set up in the salary ordinance <br />because the new law enables the Mayor to cut salaries as he sees fit and he would have to have <br />some figure to do this. Mr. Sweeney said that this might well be opening a can of worms and <br />it would be unwise to do this now. Councilman Miller said that it was not necessary to start a <br />secretary with no experience at the top salary. With the range in salary, she can work up to <br />the top level and get the maximum salary. Councilman Parent said that, because of the_- .legis- <br />lation enabling the Mayor to lower salaries, he had consulted with one of the men from the State <br />Board of Accounts and he had suggested that the Council could set a salary range. Mr. Sweeney <br />said that this was an advisory opinion and that he was expressing a legal opinion. Councilman <br />Parent said that it might be wise not to take this kind of action, since the opinion from the <br />State Board of Accounts was not a legal opinion. Mrs. Janet Allen expressed the opinion that <br />the Council might pass an ordinance saying they would use a range in setting salaries. Mr. <br />Sweeney said that such an ordinance was not needed. Councilman Miller then gave the changes <br />recommended in the Salary Ordinance by the Fees and Salaries Committee as follows: Delete the <br />following sections: Public Service Careers, Manpower Area Program Component, Model Cities, <br />Redevelopment, and Youth Services Bureau. Custodian I, Custodian II and Maintenance Technician <br />listed under Redevelopment should be under Morris Civic Auditorium. Maintenance Man I listed <br />under Redevelopment should be under the Building Department. The janitor listed under Model <br />Cities should be under the Municipal Services Facility. Under Traffic and Lighting, employ <br />Equipment Operator II at $3.58 per hour. Under Utilities- Administration, delete Keypunch <br />Operator and add Keypunch Operator I at $5450.00, Keypunch Operator II at $5,950.00 and Key- <br />punch Operator III at $6,200.00.Under General Classifications add Clerk IV. Department of <br />Human Resources Director change to $16,000. Department of Safety Director change to $15,000. <br />Director of Communications and Electronics change to $12,000. Building Commissioner change to <br />$14,538. Director of Human Relations and Fair Employment Practices Commission change to <br />$14,045. These general classifications to have minimum and maximum rates set as follows: <br />General Classifications <br />Minimum <br />Maximum <br />Secretary I <br />4,500.00 <br />5,000.00 <br />Secretary II <br />5,001.00 <br />5,500.00 <br />Secretary III <br />5,501.00 <br />6,000.00 <br />Secretary IV <br />6,000.00 <br />6,650.00 <br />Accounting Clerk I <br />5,000.00 <br />5,500.00 <br />Accounting Clerk II <br />5,501.00 <br />6,000.00 <br />Accounting Clerk III <br />6,000.00 <br />6,500.00 <br />Accounting Clerk IV <br />6,501.00 <br />7,200.00 <br />Stenographer I <br />4,500.00 <br />4,800.00 <br />Stenographer II <br />4,801.00 <br />5,300.00 <br />Clerk I <br />4,500.00 <br />4,750.00 <br />Clerk II <br />4,751.00 <br />5,000.00 <br />Clerk III <br />5,001.00 <br />5,300.00 <br />Clerk IV <br />5,301.00 <br />5,600.00 <br />Stock Clerk I <br />6,400.00 <br />6,600.00 <br />Stock Clerk II <br />6,601.00 <br />7,100.00 <br />Auditor I <br />7,800.00 <br />8,050.00 <br />Auditor II <br />8,051.00 <br />9,050.:00 <br />Auditor III <br />9,051.00 <br />10,250.00 <br />All salaried, weekly and hourly rated employees making under $7,999 per year would get a 4y <br />increase. Councilman Miller made a motion that the Council accept the report of the Committee, <br />seconded by Councilman Nemeth. Motion carried with Councilman Parent casting a nay vote. <br />Mr. James Barcome, City Controller, asked the Council, based on Mr. Sweeney's opinion that this <br />may be illegal, what procedures should the city follow on a new ordinance on the time schedule <br />that must be kept. Councilman Miller said that it was his opinion that there would have to be <br />an ordinance setting minimum and maximum salaries based on the State Personnel Act. Councilman <br />Nemeth said that a saving clause might be inserted into the ordinance so that if any part of it <br />were declared illegal it would not affect the other portions of the ordinance. Councilman <br />Newburn asked Mr. Sweeney if he thought the ordinance would be illegal. Mr. Sweeney said that <br />he felt that any citizen could bring this matter to litigation. He advised the Council to put <br />a saving clause into the ordinance. Councilman Nemeth asked Mr. Sweeney to draft such a clause. <br />Councilman Taylor made a motion that the ordinance go to the Council as favorable as amended. <br />Councilman Kopczynski seconded the motion and it carried. <br />There being no further business to come before the Committee of the Whole, Councilman Taylor <br />made a motion to rise and report to the Council, seconded by Councilman Horvath. Motion carried <br />ATTEST: <br />A <br />E-- -- , , _ . - --- 1. (o'- _ <br />CITY CLERK CHAIRMAN <br />