REGULAR MEETING JUNE 26, 1972
<br />COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING (CONTINUED)
<br />The meeting reconvened at 10:25 p.m. with the continuation of the public hearing.
<br />Mr. Joseph Guentert, 1034 Foster Street, spoke in opposition to the ordinances. He read a pre-
<br />pared statement regarding the problems of solid waste disposal and said that these ordinances
<br />are not the approach to take to solution of the problem. He recommended that the Council inves-
<br />tigate the possibility of recycling programs. He also stressed that the problem is caused by
<br />not enforcing trash and littering laws.
<br />Mrs. Odessa Brown, 230 N. Sadie Street, asked the Council to disregard these ordinances. She
<br />said that the Council should consider the welfare mothers and others who would find it a hard-
<br />ship to pay for trash hauling especially if it was put on their water bill.
<br />Mrs. Ann Wlodarski, 1869 Riverside Drive, presented a petition from members of the Fair Tax
<br />Association asking that the Council delete in their entirety the two trash ordinances.
<br />Mrs. Fanny Grunwald, 227 S. Frances Street, said that, as an All- American city, South Bend is
<br />noted for high taxes. She asked that the Council not pass the trash ordinances.
<br />Mrs. Conchita Washington introduced herself to the Council as the exonerated President of the
<br />local chapter of the N.A.A.C.P. She spoke in opposition to the Ordinances. She read a petition
<br />from the Consolidated Rubbish Corporation, a minority corporation, asking that the Council de-
<br />lete both ordinances. She said this is another case of minority group persons being hampered
<br />in their efforts to be self - supporting. These ordinances deny free enterprise and impose hard-
<br />ships on the citizens. The Consolidated Rubbish Corporation has an investment of $280,000 in
<br />equipment with 150 truck owners and over 400 employees. She said that if jobs are taken away
<br />from these people and their families you will have to support them and pay their rent. She said
<br />that the children of these families will be roaming the streets and there will be trouble.
<br />Mr. Robert Bell, 106 N. Michigan Street, spoke in opposition to the ordinances. He said he favor
<br />the free enterprise system. He said the independent trash haulers are local people doing a job
<br />in their city. He said he doesn't want the city in the trash pickup business.
<br />Mr. Earl Brown, 1230 Diamond Avenue, spoke against the ordinance. He said he knows it is a major
<br />problem to clean up the city of South Bend but he thinks the private haulers can do the job.
<br />He said the violators of trash and littering laws should be reported to the City Attorney and
<br />action should be taken against them.
<br />Mr. George Nicholas, 106 N. Michigan Street, spoke against the ordinances. He operates four
<br />restaurants in the area and prefers to contract with private haulers. He said municipal trash
<br />hauling in the City of Mishawaka, where he operates a business, has not been successful.
<br />Mrs. Mary Barbara, 750 N. Lawndale, spoke in opposition to the ordinances. She said that her
<br />husband is an independent trash hauler and that the major problem is dogs running loose who
<br />scatter the trash. She asked that the dog laws be enforced and that these ordinances be'defeated
<br />Mrs. Janet Allen, 125 W. Marion Street, opposed the ordinances. She said that the private enter-
<br />prise system is the best one and urged the Council to reject both ordinances and enforce the
<br />laws we have.
<br />Bernard White, Jr., 830 S. Wellington Street, spoke against the ordinances. He said that the
<br />city does not do a good job with garbage collection and asked that the ordinances on trash
<br />hauling be tabled.
<br />Miss Virginia Guthrie, Executive Secretary of the Civic Planning Association, asked whether it
<br />was legal to put this trash hauling charge on the water bill. Deputy Attorney Laderer said that
<br />it was. Miss Guthrie said that those who can't or won't pay their water bills will result in
<br />the taxpayers paying the bills through welfare and assistance agencies.
<br />Mr. Robert Hostetler, 206 Jennings, spoke against the ordinances and said the city should stay
<br />out of the trash hauling business.
<br />Councilman Taylor said that because of the many comments and questions raised tonight he would
<br />move for the tabling of both ordinances until the July 24, 1972 regular meeting. Councilman
<br />Miller seconded the motion. Councilman Nemeth said that it was ironic that on the agenda
<br />tonight was an ordinance encouraging private enterprise by issuing revenue bonds for the Royal
<br />Inn project and at the same time stifling private enterprise in the matter of trash hauling.
<br />Councilman Parent said that the reason the Council is dealing with this problem is that the
<br />Councilmen get calls from citizens complaining about the problems with the present trash hauling
<br />system. The private system doesn't seem to be working and the city has a responsibility to make
<br />sure it has a clean, healthy environment. He said that with a Sanitation Department budget of
<br />$350,000 and with 40,000 households paying approximately $3.00 a month for trash removal, this
<br />amounts to about $1,800,000 a year. At the present time, there are two overlapping systems
<br />operating, with the city collection of garbage and the private trash hauling system and one
<br />system picking up everything would result in more efficiency. He said that he would like the
<br />Council to take six or seven months to work on these proposals. Councilman Miller said that he
<br />would like to see the private trash haulers solve the problems in the Southeast neighborhood at
<br />a cost of $2.00 a household. He said the situation there is atrocious and cannot be allowed to
<br />continue to exist. The question was called and the motion carried.
<br />There being no further business to be considered
<br />Newburn entertained a motion to rise and report
<br />seconded by Councilman Horvath. Motion carried.
<br />ATTEST:
<br />CLERK
<br />before the Committee of the Whole, Chairman
<br />to the Council, so moved by Councilman Taylor,
<br />Time 11:50 p.m.
<br />Councilman Miller moved for a 5 minute recess, seconded by Councilman Taylor. Motion carried.
<br />REGULAR MEETING - RECONVENED
<br />Be it remembered that the Common Council of the City of South Bend, Indiana reconvened in the
<br />Council Chambers of the County -City Building on Monday, June26, 1972 at 12 < :05 a.m., Council
<br />President Peter J. Nemeth presiding.
<br />REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE ON MINUTES
<br />Your committee on the inspection and supervision of minutes would respectfully report that they
<br />have inspected the minutes of the June 12, 1972 regular meeting and found them correct. They,
<br />therefore, recommend that the same be approved.
<br />/s/ Peter J. Nemeth
<br />/s/ Terry S. Miller
<br />Upon motion made by Councilman Parent, seconded by Councilman Serge, and carried, the report was
<br />accepted and placed on file.
<br />
|