Laserfiche WebLink
. - REGULAR-- ME.ET_I:NG,: <br />NEW BUSINESS(CONTINUED) <br />He said they had already told the council that the power of expulsion exists, and the implied <br />power to discipline exists. He said it was his strong opinion with respect to any implied power <br />under the home rule statute that you do not have the power to proceed further. He said it was <br />his, somewhat hedged, opinion that you have the power to investigate if the objective is expulsioi <br />However, that could be interpreted more than one way and it does indicate that you have the right <br />to formulate your own rules in order to proceed to expel a member. One interpretation could be <br />that you have the right to enact your own rules which would govern that specific case, or you <br />have the right to formulate rules in anticipation of an offense that would merit expulsion. It <br />is difficult to say what a court might do, because this has never been decided in an Indiana <br />court. <br />Vice. -- President Dombrowski returned the chair to Council President Parent. Council President <br />Parent asked Mr. Brunner if there are implied powers when the council would set out to expel, <br />why can't those same powers be applied to a low keyed investigation. Mr. Brunner said he thought <br />they could be applied. The same powers can be applied, those powers are not implied however <br />insofar as they must be promulgated pursuant to ordinance. He said that the actual power to <br />address the problem exists, however, the actual power to address a specific incident occuring <br />on January 19, in their opinion does not exist. He said if this was a continuing problem, then <br />the council should formulate a policy whereby they can take action. He said that both Council <br />Attorney and City Attorney are merely saying you cannot take action in this case. <br />Councilman Adams, called for the question. Councilman Miller said he would withdraw his motion, <br />and Councilman Dombrowski withdrew the second. <br />Sale of City owned real estate - 524 S. Fellows Street. Council President Parent said he:was a <br />little confused, he said that earlier they had considered one of these under a resolution, and <br />now we are considering this property. Mr. Rollin Farrand, Director of the Board of Public Works, <br />said that the first one had been before them in the same form as this one asking for authoriza- <br />tion to sell, but we were not able to sell it in accordance with the ordinance, so we came back <br />to you asking permission to sell. We have a request to purchase this parcel, which is a corner <br />lot on Fellow. It has 166 frontage and is approximately 33 x 55. Assuming you give us permissio: <br />to sell then the procedure is set by ordinance. We donot have a value because it has not been <br />appraised and will not be appraised until we have your permission to sell, or a lapse of thirty <br />days without action. Councilman Szymkowiak made a motion to authorize the sale of this piece <br />of land, seconded by Councilman Dombrowski. The motion carried. <br />Councilman Adams made a motion to ask the council attorneys to investigate how closely we should <br />follow Roberts Rules in conducting our meetings, and perhaps interview a few municipalities close <br />to us to see how they conduct their meetings. Council President Parent said there was no second, <br />the motion is dead. <br />Councilman Kopczynski said that caucus meetings should be conducted in an orderly manner using <br />Roberts Rules of Order. He said he believed if you study the Municipal Code that is what it <br />called for, and you as president, I request that you conduct yourself in such a manner that you <br />run these meetings in such a way and all councilmen have the opportunity to speak whether it is <br />a caucus meeting or public meeting. I do not think'.any one should be muzzeld at any time. He <br />said he was looking forward to that type of behavior. <br />Councilman Horvath said he did not know of anytime at a caucus meeting or at a public meeting, <br />especially if you stick with the agenda you are not muzzled. He said that anyone that wants to <br />talk has been allowed to talk. He said he would have to disagree with Councilman Kopczynski. <br />Council President Parent said that this was about the umpteenth time he had been accused by <br />Councilman Kopczynski of muzzling him. He said the meetings were taped and that he would like <br />for the council to take a sample, or all of the tapes, and get this matter resolved once and for <br />all. He said he had to run the meetings according to the rules. He said he thought these were <br />serious charges, and they were usually brought out at public meetings. He said he usually did <br />not say too much about these things, but in this case I am going to ask the council to look into <br />the matter. He said we are not supposed to be conducting our business in this manner, and that <br />did not want to be accused again. He said an ordinance will be submitted to allow the council <br />to rule on such matters and enforce the rules. <br />There being no further business to come before the council, unfinished or new, Councilman Taylor <br />made a motion to adjourn, seconded by Councilman Adams. The motion carried, and the meeting <br />adjourned at 9:50 p.m. <br />ATTEST: <br />.1 APPROV�� <br />CITY CLERK <br />..D <br />'F-F-I-. +-h-E--I-'F. F- hl -.-h-h+-1--f--f- ............ ................. ....... F t.. <br />