Laserfiche WebLink
REGULAR MEETING AUGUST 25, 1975 <br />COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING (CONTINUED) <br />account. He felt the amount budgeted would be sufficient. Mr. Evans asked for a breakdown in the <br />rents for the Board of Public Works. Mr. Vance indicated that the amount in the Rent Account <br />covered the maintenance on the building and the rental of the fire hydrants. Mr. Evans indicated <br />that there was an increase in the Instructional Account in the Department of Public Safety. He <br />wondered about this. Mr. Michael Carrington, Public Safety Director, indicated that he had not <br />increased that amount; however, he was informed that that amount covered the materials for OSHA <br />in the Employee Safety Department. Mr. Evans asked for an explanation of the Other Contractuals <br />Account. Mr. Carrington indicated that, this year, the amount was used to pay for interns in the <br />Department of Public Safety and Criminal Justice, and was used for match money by the city. He <br />indicated that, next year, the amount would be used in the same manner. Mr. Evans indicated that <br />one car was being replaced in the Bureau of Buildings. He asked about this. Mr. Rollin Farrand, <br />Director of the Department of Public Works, indicated that the cars in that department were quite <br />old and the replacement schedule had not been very intense in the past. He stated that at least <br />three cars were needed. Mr. Evans questioned the new account for postage in the Police Department. <br />Mr. David Sypniewski, Fiscal Officer for the Police Department, indicated that the account was <br />inserted into the budget because many times evidence and other documents must be mailed directly <br />at the post office in order that a certified receipt is obtained to prove the documents were <br />mailed. Mr. Evans asked for an explanation of the reduction in Account 260, Other Contractuals. <br />Mr. Sypniewski indicated that a new line item was still used for matching funds. Mr. Evans raised <br />the issue of police cars being used in other city departments rather than trading the vehicles in. <br />He wondered about the feasibility of converting the cars. Mr. Farrand indicated that the Board of <br />Public Works had studied that issue and eight of the police cars had been used in this manner. He <br />was hopeful that the practice could be continued. Mr. Evans questioned the advisability of no <br />change in the Electric Account within the Fire Department. Assistant Fire Chief Joseph Nagy <br />indicated that he had submitted an increase; however, it had not been put into the budget. He <br />felt the department would be short for 1976 in that area and additional funds would have to be <br />requested of the Council. Mr. Evans indicated that there was a reduction in the Rent Account. <br />Assistant Chief Nagy indicated that the rent covered the purchase of three vehicles in the past <br />and would no longer be needed. Mr. Evans indicated that there was no additional funding in the <br />Motor Equipment Account. He questioned this. Assistant Chief Nagy indicated that he had submitted <br />a budget for motor equipment but it had been taken out. He was not sure how this matter would be <br />handled in 1976. Mr. Evans wondered if the Fire Department was being underbudgeted, and he felt <br />this could jeapordize the lives and safety of the citizens. In the Park Department, he questioned <br />the amount for band concerts, and Mr. James Seitz, Superintendent of Parks, explained that the <br />entire bill for the band concerts was paid at once; and that was the reason why the expenditures in <br />that account through June 30th were so small. Mr. Evans wondered about the benefit to.the citizens <br />of having the park personnel in uniforms. Mr. Seitz indicated that the men could be easily iden- <br />tified for assistance, etc. He stated that it was a benefit to the employees and was part of the <br />union negotiations for 1976. Mr. Evans indicated that he was concerned about the condition of the <br />streets for 1976. He stated that, in the Materials Account, there was a reduction. Mr. Vance <br />indicated that the administration hoped that revenue sharing funds could be used in this area. Mr. <br />Evans indicated that the clothing allowance in the Street Department was new. He wondered about <br />this, and Mr. Vance indicated that, as Mr. Seitz had stated, this was one of the items sought by <br />the union and it involved over 100 men including supervisors. Mr. Evans indicated that not all <br />employees were given clothing allowance. He wondered about the need to supply these people with <br />the same raise as those persons who did not receive clothing allowance. Under Police Pension, he <br />wondered if Account 262 had been reduced to zero, and it was indicated that the account had not <br />been. Mr. Dick Hazinski, Secretary of the Police Pension Fund, indicated that the money needed in <br />that account was necessary in case anyone retired under disability. Mr. Evans indicated that a <br />request for $100,000 for Goodwill Industries was proposed to be taken from revenue sharing funds. <br />He was concerned over the limit of the revenue sharing funds and the receipt of these funds. He <br />wondered whether or not all the agencies could be funded that would need to be. Chairman Newburn <br />thanked Mr. Evans for the fine work the Civic Planning Association has done and its investigations <br />into many matters. <br />Councilman Nemeth wondered in what account the increase of insurance was reflected, and Mr. Walter <br />Lantz, Chief Deputy Controller, indicated that that was included in Account 640 in the Controller'; <br />budget. The park maintenance and motor vehicle highway departments each had their own budgets for <br />insurance. Councilman Nemeth wondered if there were any other adjustments to be made. Mr. Lantz <br />indicated that the tax computations would have to be made. He read the revised tax computations a; <br />follows: <br />Page 54 Corporation General <br />Line <br />1 <br />$11,397,070 <br />Line <br />5 <br />19,271,684 <br />Line <br />10 <br />9,235,283 <br />Line <br />11 <br />3,275 <br />Line <br />12 <br />9,238,558 <br />Motor Vehicle Highway <br />Line <br />1 <br />1,402,444 <br />Line <br />5 <br />2,181,447 <br />Line <br />10 <br />-0- <br />Line <br />11 <br />-0- <br />Line <br />12 <br />-0- <br />In the motor vehicle highway budget, Mr. Lantz recommended that the amount be removed from 110 <br />because the anticipated revenues were greater than anticipated. Councilman Nemeth made such a <br />motion, seconded by Council President Parent. The motion carried. There was then a brief dis- <br />cussion on the motion, after which Councilman Nemeth made a motion to strike the previous motion <br />and remove the amount from 120, seconded by Councilman Kopczynski. That motion carried. Mr. <br />Lantz then continued to read the remaining computations as follows: <br />Fire Pension <br />Line <br />1 <br />$ 1,252,217 <br />Line <br />5 <br />1,813,608 <br />Line <br />10 <br />800,556 <br />Line <br />11 <br />213 <br />Line <br />12 <br />800,769 <br />