Laserfiche WebLink
REGULAR MEETING JULY 28 1975 <br />COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING (CONTINUED) <br />call vote on Councilman Miller's motion to delete the increase in the Firefighter First Class <br />position. The motion lost by a vote of five nays (Councilmen Serge, Szymkowiak, Taylor, Newburn <br />and Parent) and four ayes (Councilmen Miller, Kopczynski, Horvath and Nemeth). <br />There was a call for the question on the original motion to amend the ordinance made by <br />Councilman Taylor. A roll call vote was again requested. The motion carried by a roll call vote <br />of nine ayes (Councilmen Serge, Szymkowiak, Miller, Taylor, Kopczynski, Horvath, Nemeth, Newburn <br />and Parent). <br />Firefighter Tim Brassell of the Wage Committee wondered if the pension plan for the policemen <br />would be increased and not that of the firefighters. He did not feel this should be so. <br />Councilman Miller felt there was a difference because of the change in the date to December 31, <br />1975. He felt a legal interpretation was required. Council President Parent felt there was a <br />difference of six months; however, the concept was the same. He stated that the attorney for the <br />policemen had felt there would not be a conflict. Firefighter Brassell indicated that the police <br />pension had increased $240 last year over the firefighters. Councilman Taylor stated that the <br />Council had cut in half the disparity that existed. Firefighter Brassell stated that there was a <br />surplus within the salary account in the Fire Department of approximately $40,000. He wondered <br />why this surplus could not be used for increased salaries and clothing allowance. He talked about <br />the transfers of funds which occur within the salary account during the year, and he wondered why <br />a transfer could not be made for the $40,000 surplus in order that it could be used for salaries i <br />1976. He stated that he wondered where the city's priorities were at times. He talked about the <br />possibility of collective bargaining in the future. Firefighter Randy Magdalinski, Chairman of th <br />Wage Committee, thanked the Council for appropriating additional funds for the paramedics. He <br />indicated that, prior to the amendment concerning the $300 for the policemen, there would have bee <br />some officers who would not have received the $416 increase. He stated that now, at least they <br />would receive no less than $300. He indicated that 23 firefighters would be eliminated from the <br />pay raise for next year unless such a provision was included in the salary ordinance. Firefighter <br />Don Luckett felt the three lowest ranked salaries should be increased the same amount as the other <br />ranks. Mr. Evans indicated that there was a difference in the clothing allowance for policemen <br />and firemen. He stated that the association hoped the allowance would be the same for both <br />departments. Councilman Miller indicated that it was difficult to negotiate wages. He felt it wa <br />understandable that each side would present positions which would favor one side. He felt this <br />was a disadvantage to the Council because it had to look at the total picture. He also felt that <br />the policemen and firefighters have conducted themselves in a professional manner throughout the <br />negotiations, and he commended the officers for this. He stated that the Council's efforts showed <br />that it wished to improve some of the inequities that existed. He indicated that the police and <br />fire pensions were a "hang -up" and would continue to be. He stated that the city did not know how <br />this pension would increase in future years and this presented a problem. Council President <br />Parent felt that, in view of the financial condition of the city, the ordinance, as amended, was <br />fair although not exactly what he would have proposed. <br />Council President Parent made a motion that the ordinance be recommended favorably, as amended, <br />to the Common Council, seconded by Councilman Taylor. Chairman Newburn requested a roll call vote <br />The motion carried by a vote of nine ayes (Councilmen Serge, Szymkowiak, Miller, Taylor, Kopczynsk <br />Horvath, Nemeth, Newburn and Parent). <br />Councilman Taylor made a motion to recess, seconded by Council President Parent. The motion <br />carried, and the Committee of the Whole recessed at 8:40 p.m. Reconvened at 9:00 p.m. <br />ORDINANCE AN ORDINANCE FIXING MAXIMUM SALARIES AND <br />WAGES OF APPOINTED OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES <br />OF THE CITY OF SOUTH BEND, INDIANA, FOR <br />THE YEAR 1976. <br />This being the time heretofore set for public hearing on the abc <br />opponents were given an opportunity to be heard. Mr. James Roer <br />sentation for the ordinance. He stated that the ordinance inch <br />policemen and firefighters. He stated that what was recommender <br />across - the -board of $500 or 24 � an hour for the hourly personn( <br />last several months, there had been many items requested by the <br />counteroffered. Only one of the issues had come to the Council; <br />He referred to his letter dated July 10th which had been sent tc <br />the entire negotiations. He stated that the union ratification <br />the proposed ordinance had been filed in the Clerk's Office. HE <br />change in the ratification in that, rather than the 244 an hour <br />be made with $84 towards dependent hospitalization by the city. <br />the Teamsters Local 364. which consisted of approximately 350 c: <br />ve ordinance, proponents and <br />er, City Attorney, made the pre - <br />ded basically all employees except <br />in the ordinance was an increase <br />1. He explained that, over the <br />union and all the requests had bee <br />that being the 25G per hour rate. <br />the Council, in which he summariz <br />had occurred on the evening that <br />stated that there was a slight <br />increase, a 20� an hour increase <br />Mr. Michael Lawrence, representin <br />tv emplovees, indicated that the <br />committee had met with the Council and had hoped for a greater increase. The total package; <br />however, was ratified on July 9th with the 20fi an hour increase and the $84 contribution by the <br />city toward dependent hospitalization. Mr. Gene Evans, Executive Secretary of the Civic Planning <br />Association, questioned the salary of the Greenskeeper in the Park Department. He indicated that <br />the salary had been raised from $10,000 to $13,000. Mr. James Seitz, Director of the Department <br />of Public Parks, explained that a $3,000 increase had been proposed because of the qualifications <br />and training of the greenskeepers. He talked about the amount of money put into the city's golf <br />courses and the need to maintain the courses in the best way possible. He felt sure the revenue <br />from the gold courses would be increased. He indicated that the average greenskeeper salary <br />ranged from $17,000 to $20,000. Mr. Evans wondered about the $618 increase for the Director of <br />the Newman Center, and Mr. Seitz explained that the department was trying to equalize the salaries <br />of the directors for the centers. Mr. Evans indicated that there was a large increase made in the <br />position of Director of the Communications Bureau, and also the addition of three new positions. <br />He questioned this, and Mr. Michael Carrington, Public Safety Director, stated that the department <br />was in desperate need of additional personnel and an increased salary for the director because of <br />the qualifications and responsibilities. He indicated that the department was trying to make that <br />position more in line with comparable positions. He indicated that, with the three additional <br />positions, a wage differential would be realized. <br />Councilman Serge wondered if the $3,000 raise for the greenskeeper would keep the men in South Be <br />and Mr. Seitz indicated that he could not guarantee that; however, he felt the increases would <br />definitely help the city keep the professional greenskeepers it presently had. Councilman <br />