My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CED Annexation Policy Plan 1992
sbend
>
Public
>
Archived Plan Documents
>
CED Annexation Policy Plan 1992
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/22/2025 10:03:16 AM
Creation date
4/22/2025 10:02:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Dept of Community Investment
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
67
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Presently, each code inspector is assigned to a councilmanic district. This <br />method of assignment may be an efficient method of satisfactorily providing <br />the service and is an outstanding way to maintain public accountability for <br />elected officials. This method of assignment may need to be modified with <br />future City growth. The City's annexation program may focus on one or two <br />priority areas. When annexed, this territory will be added to a councilmanic <br />district. Thus, increased service demand for one or two code inspectors may <br />occur and, furthermore, a possible reduction in service which focuses only <br />upon the priority code violation may also be necessary. Should annexations <br />take place at various locations around the entire corporate limits, then all <br />inspectors could be faced with additional service demands and a possibility of <br />reduced service for second priority services. <br />Various distribution or assignment methods can be considered when <br />developing the plan for providing neighborhood code enforcement services <br />for future City growth through annexation. One method would be to <br />designate one or more as -needed code inspectors to respond to certain <br />councilmanic districts when increased demands occur. These as -needed <br />inspectors would allow the department to maintain the benefits of <br />representing each councilmanic district as afforded by the present service <br />method. Another method would be to establish new staff positions for <br />certain lower priority types of violations or complaints. These inspectors <br />could serve city-wide and thus allow the councilmanic district code <br />inspectors to focus upon the priority neighborhood services. Another <br />method would be to abandon the assignments by councilmanic district and <br />establish all new districts. This method would allow for periodic boundary <br />adjustments to satisfy new demands caused by annexation and, based upon <br />the plan's guideline criteria, would be able to identify when new districts are <br />needed along with additional staff. Any of these or other possible service <br />methods should review past violations and complaints in specific areas of <br />the City and consider land use, density and social/economic factors. <br />The Bureau of Weights and Measures should be impacted very little by <br />annexation. Additional staff may be needed in the long term and will need <br />to be identified when the need arises. <br />The Code Enforcement Clean-up Crew may also need to be expanded. This <br />service appears to be directly linked to the effort of the code inspectors and <br />can fluctuate, based upon the number of property owners that do not comply <br />with clean-up citations. Multi -departmental services such as with the Park <br />Department or Department of Public Works could be developed to offset the <br />need for partial staff expansion or service demand fluctuations. <br />27 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.