Laserfiche WebLink
42 <br />Lot width analysis in Sherman & Harrison target area <br />The neighborhood level lot width analysis was used <br />to conduct a lot analysis within the target area. Lot <br />combinations, where there are multiple adjacent <br />vacant lots, were analyzed to determine typical di- <br />mensions and explore what opportunities exist for a <br />variety of building types in the area. <br />$- <br />$828,266 <br />$2,804,978 <br />$5,850,195 <br />$9,632,290 <br />0 <br />50 <br />100 <br />150 <br />200 <br />250 <br />300 <br /> $- <br /> $2,000,000 <br /> $4,000,000 <br /> $6,000,000 <br /> $8,000,000 <br /> $10,000,000 <br /> $12,000,000 <br />Year 0 Year 5 Cumulative <br />Revenue <br />Year 10 Cumulative <br />Revenue <br />Year 15 Cumulative <br />Revenue <br />Year 20 Cumulative <br />Revenue Total # of UnitsProperty Tax RevenueCumulative Property Tax Revenue & Unit Count <br />Oneplex <br />Duplex <br />Fourplex <br />Townhome <br />Cottage Court <br />Legend Oneplex <br />Duplex <br />Fourplex <br />Townhome <br />Cottage Court <br />Legend Oneplex <br />Duplex <br />Fourplex <br />Townhome <br />Cottage Court <br />Legend Oneplex <br />Duplex <br />Fourplex <br />Townhome <br />Cottage Court <br />Legend Oneplex <br />Duplex <br />Fourplex <br />Townhome <br />Cottage Court <br />Legend <br />No matter which building type is developed on a <br />particular property, there are some basic guiding prin- <br />ciples that should be followed to ensure that there is <br />cohesive and thoughtful development: <br />• Building design should be completed with a spe- <br />cial consideration for the character of the neigh- <br />borhood; <br />• Larger scale buildings are most appropriate at <br />corridors, nodes, and/or corner locations; <br />• More intense uses should be focused along the <br />corridors or in nodes; <br />• Buildings should address the street; <br />• Details will assist in making buildings consistent <br />with the neighborhood – including, but not lim- <br />ited to: roof design and pitch, exterior trim size, <br />porch or stoop proportions, first floor elevation, <br />eaves, etc.; and <br />• Consistent with City Code, garages will be ac- <br />cessed off an alley where one is present. <br />Using the Residential Market Potential Study as a <br />basis, projected 5, 10, and 20-year build-out scenarios <br />were developed. These are not intended to show the <br />exact type and location of new buildings but rather <br />provide a vision for how the neighborhood could <br />develop based on general urban planning and mar- <br />ket-based principles. <br />The buildout scenarios may appear aggressive, and <br />many of the units are anticipated to be missing mid- <br />dle housing types such as duplexes and fourplexes <br />rather than single family houses. As a result, the devel- <br />opment of one parcel could account for two or four <br />units. <br />Based on the future scenarios, the potential property <br />tax revenue was calculated for the target area. Under- <br />standing the potential tax revenue provides a frame - <br />work for examining the return on investment (ROI) <br />and can help determine the type and amount of City <br />investment. In five (5) years roughly $800,000 in tax <br />revenue could be generated and by year twenty (20) <br />a cumulative total of over $9 million in tax revenue is <br />possible based on the developed buildout scenarios. <br />For additional information, see Appendix 4. <br />As part of the process, proformas were created for <br />each housing type in order to examine the current <br />market viability within the Sherman & Harrison tar- <br />get area. It was determined that none of the housing <br />products examined can be accomplished with the tra- <br />ditional financing model. Based on this, we then ex- <br />plored what needs to happen in order to “get to yes” <br />rather than simply saying it does or does not work. <br />Of scenarios, the duplex appears to be most viable. <br />Viability of a housing type is determined based on <br />the amount of variation from the traditional financial <br />model that is required to make construction possible. <br />While both the owner-occupied duplex and purely for <br />rent duplex both perform relatively well, the own- <br />er-occupied duplex has the benefit of lower operating <br />expenses which improves its financial performance. <br />Financial constraints are based on the proforma – <br />including the baseline assumptions – and current <br />market conditions. The examination of market viabil- <br />ity helped identify the potential programs to assist <br />with addressing the financial gap which are listed in <br />the Neighborhood Strategy. Since the findings are <br />based on market conditions within a specific geogra- <br />phy – the Sherman & Harrison target area – it cannot <br />be assumed that the findings will directly apply to <br />other locations. Differing market conditions will result <br />in different levels of viability and differing financial <br />needs for the construction of the various housing <br />types. For additional information on the proformas, <br />see Appendix 3. <br />While efforts will focus in the Sherman & Harrison tar- <br />get area, it is anticipated that development will occur <br />in other portions of the neighborhood, building off <br />existing or future strengths and spreading outwards. <br />NORTH