My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
July 1988
sbend
>
Public
>
Historic Preservation
>
Meeting Minutes and Recordings
>
HPC Meeting Minutes 1988
>
July 1988
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/7/2023 3:19:26 PM
Creation date
3/26/2021 4:06:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
South Bend HPC
HPC Document Type
Minutes
HPC Document Description
HPC Meeting Minutes
BOLT Control Number
1001757
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
e) The costs for renovation and restoration of the <br />Vocational/Technical building and Boilerhouse will <br />severely affect the quality and feasibility of the <br />renovation of Central High School; <br />f) The cost of renovation for the Vocational/Technical <br />building into leasible space would create leasehold <br />costs that would not be competitive in the market <br />place. <br />STANDARDS <br />Part 1 <br />B. Treatment <br />A treatment change . . . to the landmark or its <br />environment may [not] . . significantly alter the <br />appearance of the landmark . . . [and] . . . the <br />Commission should review the proposed treatment for <br />character and style consistency . . . and [the treatment] <br />should be added in a manner that does not disrupt the <br />visual unity of the site. <br />C. Additions to landmarks should not detract from the <br />original form and unity of the landmark and should not <br />cover singular examples of architectural detail. <br />Additions to landmarks should be added in a manner that <br />does not disrupt the visible unity or overall appearance <br />of the site. <br />Part 2 <br />D. Demolition <br />Historic landmarks shall not be demolished. k1hen a <br />landmark poses a. threat to the public safely, and <br />demolition is the only alternative, documentation by way <br />of photographs, measured drawings, or other descriptive <br />methods should be made of both the exterior and interior <br />of the landmark. <br />RECOMMENDATION <br />Part 1 <br />Staff recommends approval of items la, 1b, Id, and le <br />because the original historic_ character is either retained <br />or recreated. Since the handicapped ramp will be located at <br />an existing entry and will be below grade, stafff recommends <br />approval of item is because the ramp will not negatively <br />affect the historic character of the entrance. Additional <br />drawings should be submitted showing that the length of the <br />ramp will be accommodated within the existing space. <br />Staff recommends item if to be tabled pending receipt of <br />additional information. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.