Laserfiche WebLink
r <br />power point summary provided at the last Utilities meeting, a brochure also provided at the last <br />Utilities Committee meeting dated October 2005 entitled "River Report", and a one -page <br />handout entitled "Notice of Hearing -Sewer Rate Change" (copies attached). He noted that the <br />handouts include a "typical resident" summary of 5,000 gallons per month, and noted that <br />seniors would probably pay less because their usage is less. <br />Dr. Varner noted that Marion County was noted listed in the city's information. A recent article <br />showed that their monthly rates of $9.95 will go to $18.00. Mr. Dillon stated that they are also <br />planning to implement a phased -in rate increase. Mr. Skomp of Crowe Chizek stated that <br />Indianapolis is able to keep their rates lower because of subsidies from property taxes, however <br />he was unable to state the percentage of that subsidy. <br />In response to a question from Dr. Varner, Mr. Dillon stated that both the EPA Region No. 5 and <br />IDEM are reviewing the city's progress. Mayor Luecke noted however that EPA can "trump" <br />IDEM. <br />John R. Skomp of Crowe Chizek and Company LLC stated that a rate financial report has been <br />filed with the Office of the City Clerk. He then provided a letter dated November 14, 2005 to <br />the Committee which addressed among other items the I/N Tek letter and recommendation from <br />Steven K. Brock. Mr. Skomp stated that he believes that Brock's recommendation would lead to <br />lower rates in the short-term but may lead to higher rates in the long -term. He noted that various <br />suggestions and scenarios were discussed by the Advisory Committee. <br />In response to questions from Dr. Varner, Mr. Gilot stated that in 2003 there was a 24% across <br />the board increase and in 2004 there was a 5% across the board increase. <br />Rick Campoli, Controller of I N Tek I/N Kote, noted that his company appreciates the efforts of <br />the Advisory Committee. Steven K. Brock did send a letter dated October 12, 2005 where he <br />outlined a fixed percentage approach over 20 years. Similar approaches have been used in <br />Boston and Atlanta to fund their CSO requirements. He stated that he believes that this is <br />another option worth considering where the increases would be just short of 10% increase each <br />year. He noted that modeling has been done, however that Mr. Brock was unable to be here <br />today on such late notice. <br />Mr. Skomp stated that he has not seen the model highlighted in Mr. Brock's letter. <br />Dr. Varner suggested that if the study is available that it should be made available to everyone. <br />He questioned why the city should have customers pay more upfront if the end result over 20 <br />years would be the same. <br />Mayor Luecke noted that philosophical issues are involved, noting that once the city gets past the <br />first four (4) years there should then be single digit increases. Mr. Dillon added that each year <br />there is $4 -5 million proposed for equipment and repairs. <br />Mr. Gilot stated that the city is now in control and they would like to remain that way. He noted <br />that the Board of Public Works is working with the University of Notre Dame on an embedded <br />sensor network. UND is the second largest customer and they are discussing having UND <br />reroute so that there would be only a sanitary line coming into the plant and they are discussing <br />November 14, 2005 Utilities Committee of the 2005 South Bend Common Council -Page 2 of 3 - <br />