My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
July 2017
sbend
>
Public
>
Historic Preservation
>
Meeting Minutes and Recordings
>
HPC Meeting Minutes 2017
>
July 2017
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/11/2019 1:16:21 PM
Creation date
6/8/2020 10:18:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
South Bend HPC
HPC Document Type
Minutes
BOLT Control Number
1001364
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
94
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Karl Nichols, Gethsemane Church of God, 308 South Walnut — church adjacent to the land Eric <br />owns. They own property between viaduct and Firehouse and are in the process of developing it. <br />It is not appropriate to leave the Firehouse vacant and abandoned. The neighborhood is growing. <br />No one cares what the building looks like; they care that it is not vacant. Please approve the COA. <br />Kirstin Champer, 1240 West Thomas: Supports project not just because she is Eric's wife, but <br />because of what its improvement has done for the community. This building is becoming a <br />community hub. Before the windows were boarded up, kids were breaking them out. A lot of the <br />things Eric is doing takes into consideration the area where this building is located. A new roof is <br />necessary to preserve the building, but a flat roof may not drain as well, and is economically not <br />feasible. At the end of the day, it came down to saving the building and securing the community <br />or making the roof look pretty. It's not a cute roof, but in this case, it comes down to purpose over <br />aesthetics, for the safety of the building and the protection of the community. <br />Gloria Jones, 2705 Fredrickson: You need to understand the history of the firehouse. It's not like <br />Tippecanoe Place or Kizer House. It is a simpler structure that's part of the fabric of the local <br />neighborhood. The Commissioners assured that this building is just as important as Tippecanoe or <br />any other landmark. <br />Commissioner Gordon moved to deny application as submitted. Seconded by Commissioner <br />Anderson. No further discussion. President Klusczinski clarified that votes in the affirmative will <br />support the motion to deny the application and reminded the members to state their reasons when <br />voting. Roll call was ordered. <br />Commissioner Hertel (AYE) — under Standards and Guidelines Group B Section C this would alter <br />and modify the structure and change it greatly by adding this type of roof; plus, we are lacking <br />information on the materials to be used for completion of the roof. <br />Commissioner Buccellato (AYE) — The design simply does not meet the existing character of the <br />structure. <br />Commissioner Anderson (AYE) — It would alter the fagade, architectural integrity, and its style, <br />which are some of the most important things we have to make a decision on as a Commission. <br />Commissioner Gordon (AYE) — It is not in keeping with the guidelines for this building, does not <br />keep the historical character or look of the building, and we are missing some information of how <br />that roof would be covered. <br />Commissioner Klusczinski (AYE) — Ordinance 9037-99 designating 1240 West Thomas Street as <br />a Local Landmark details a number of stylistic features, specifically two-story Period Revival Fire <br />Station with flat roof and limestone parapet coping. Long term preservation of the structure and <br />safety of its occupants are not served by the installation which is both inadequate and architecturally <br />inappropriate. I affirm the staff recommendation for flat roof and the noted remedies for violations <br />of Minimum Maintenance Standards and seek the support of this body, the Building Department, <br />Code Enforcement, and the owner's cooperation to effect changes that will preserve this unique <br />and special building. I also believe that the current roof being proposed is not in keeping with the <br />Standards and Guidelines that the Commission must use in review of all the local historic <br />landmarks under its jurisdiction. I believe that other more appropriate remedies exist and should <br />be explored instead of granting this particular application. <br />Commissioner Molnar (AYE) — The design is too far outside of the mandated Standards and <br />Guidelines which the Commission, by law, must follow. The roof would be prominent in display <br />in the front of the structure, as opposed to the rear. I would be in favor of looking at something <br />with a lower pitch, not necessarily a flat roof. <br />None opposed. Vote: 6 — 0 <br />COA#2017-0602A Denied. <br />S. 821 Ashland COA#2017-0605 Chapin Park <br />15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.