July 2017 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

the buildings historic fabric should be removed. However, trees and plant materials that must be removed should be immediately replaced by suitable flora. Front yard areas should not be fenced except in cases where historic documentation would indicate such fencing appropriate. Fencing should be in character with the buildings style, materials, and scale. 3. Prohibited No changes may be made to the appearance of the site by removing major landscaping items, trees, fencing, walkways, outbuildings, and other elements before evaluating their importance to the property's history and development. Front yard areas shall not be transformed into parking lots nor paved nor blacktopped. The installation of unsightly devices such as TV reception dishes and solar collectors shall not be permitted in areas where they can be viewed from public thoroughfares. Minimum Maintenance Standards approved by the Historic Preservation Commission, December 16, 1991, state that "all landmarks and all contributing structures located in an historic district shall be preserved from decay and deterioration, and shall be maintained in good repair and kept structurally sound. The owner or other person having charge or control of landmarks and property in an historic district shall not allow or permit deterioration of such property from defects or conditions which in the judgment of the Commission produce a detrimental effect on the character of the district as a whole or the life and character of the landmark, structure or property in question." In particular, this property exhibits the following from the itemized (but not exclusive) list of detrimental conditions: b. Deterioration of roofs or other horizontal members causing conditions such as sagging, splitting, buckling, crumbling, holes, missing shingles or similar conditions; e. The ineffective waterproofing of exterior walls, roof and foundations, including broken windows or doors; h. The deterioration of any feature so as to create or permit the creation of any hazardous or unsafe condition or conditions. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: After careful review of this application, it appears to a large degree to be similar as applied for in COA application 2016-0809 that was denied by HPC and is a pending Violation of City Ordinance with the Building Department. As in COA 2016-0809, Staff does not recommend approval of the roof deviation from flat to asymmetrical gable and does not recommend a roof on only half of the structure as it does not conform to the standards and guidelines, A, B, and C. Staff recommends approval of a flat roof covering the entire main structure. Staff recommends that the owner be in compliance with the Building Department at the request of the Building Commissioner and that all work is remanded to the discretion of the Building Department prior to installation. Staff recommends that the owner be in compliance with Code Enforcement as there are noted violations of Minimum Maintenance Standards. Elicia Feasel, Executive Director Deb Parcell, Deputy Director Owner corrected staff report reference to structural inspection by Siqueira, LLC, regarding inadequate joists spanning 17.5' and 10' as these reference the second story addition in COA 2017- 0602A and do not reference the roof project of this COA. Commission Questions: With respect to discussion regarding the withdrawal of the current application to allow for changes that better reflect design guidelines, President Klusczinski asked the applicant if he wished to withdraw his application. The applicant declined. Public Hearing: Mike Boyd, 1207 West Thomas: Could this application be withdrawn and come back with application with different options for roof— different dimensions and/or style? Executive Director Feasel reminded that when denying COA 2016-0809 for this same roof project, four Commissioners specifically requested additional quotes/design options. Mr. Boyd further hopes we will work together to move this project forward. Theresa Johnson, 2630 Prairie Avenue, Apt. 1-108: Asked for clarification on what needs to be done for this to pass. If Eric followed the suggestions proposed, would it be OK? The Commissioners explained what details they would need to approve a project that would be more in keeping with the guidelines. Unetta Jones, 1204 Thomas: Questioned what kind of roof the Commission wanted to see? President Klusczinski explained that to be approved, a new roof would have to be more in keeping with standards and guidelines. 14