December 2016 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

APPLICATION ITEMS: In renovating my mudroom it was found to be unsalvageable (termites, rotted wood). I would like to pull down the existing structure and replace with a half porch/half external storage where mudroom used to stand. The cost to rebuild the mudroom "as is" was prohibitive at $25K. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT: Owner proposes to remove the existing mudroom at rear of house and replace it with an enclosed exterior storage area and open porch. This project will not change the current footprint of the house, as the existing brick foundation will be the foundation for the proposed storage/porch. The east side of the current area will be an enclosed storage space, to be sided with LP Smartside, and will include a door off of the proposed exterior porch for access. The west side will be a wood porch with wood railing. The current interior door to the mudroom will be replaced with an exterior door to the porch, and an exterior light will be installed by the door as well as on the back of the storage area. If the rear second floor door must be removed to accommodate the new porch roofline, it will be replaced with a window. (see attached project description, site plan, and drawings) PRESERVATION SPECIALIST REPORT: I have been in contact of the property owner, Lea Zimmer since late September when she had called about how to proceed with the deconstruction and rebuilding of her rear mudroom/entrance. There are issues and the room is pulling away from the rest of the house. She had hired Pat Ashton of Ashton Construction to perform the work. I have dealt with Mr. Ashton on several jobs most recently an intensive remodel on West Northshore. They had received RME 2016-1011 a to complete the task. However, after more investigation, the repairs are more structural in nature and will require footer work as well. Ms. Zimmer and Mr. Ashton were exploring other options beyond just repair of the existing addition, since it would all have to come down. I know that the lot is small and with the alley behind there are limitations as to what can be built according to the building department requirements. Hence, the new COA 2016-1109a. Steve Szaday, Preservation Specialist STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES: Edgewater Place III. NEW CONSTRUCTION A. HEIGHT AND PROPORTION The majority of structures in the district are two stories in high and are square or rectangular in plan. There are a few single -story bungalows. The most prevalent facade proportions are between a 1:1 and 1:2 height to width ratio. Required The height of a new structure and its height to width proportions shall be consistent with adjacent buildings in the district. The building height shall be no greater than that of the tallest existing structure and no less than that of the lowest existing structure in the same block. Facade proportions shall be established by permitting no structure with a facade wider or narrower than those existing in the same block. Additions to existing buildings shall be related in height and proportion to the existing structure. Recommended Contemporary designs should be compatible in character and mood to the building or neighborhood. Prohibited Additions may not be constructed that would change the existing facade of a building, alter its scale or architectural character, or add new height. Not Recommended New stories should not be added, nor should existing stories be removed, which would destroy important architectural details, features or spaces of the building. Any style or period of architecture that is incompatible with what exists should not be permitted in the new additions. B. BUILDING MATERIALS IN NEW CONSTRUCTION Wall materials in the district range from brick, clapboard, shingles and masonry to aluminum siding. Required Exterior materials used on a new structure shall be compatible in type, scale, texture, and color with adjacent structures. Materials used on an addition to an existing structure shall relate to the existing or original materials of that structure. As much of the original structure as possible shall be retained so that the addition could be removed without damage to the basic structure and appearance of the building. Recommended Aluminum or vinyl siding may be used when it is the only feasible alternative. This siding should be compatible in size and style and with the materials of other buildings in the district. Prohibited Inappropriate materials such as asbestos, asphalt, cast stone, or artificial brick may not be used. Not Recommended Glass blocks should not be used. Concrete block should not be used for anything other than foundations. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: As the proposed removal of the mudroom and addition of the porch/exterior storage does not change the size, scale, or character of the house, it conforms to the district standards and guidelines. Staff recommends approval. Elicia Feasel, Executive Director Deb Parcell, Deputy Director 7