Laserfiche WebLink
undermining public facilities and would result in a reduction of erosion -induced turbidity and <br />sedimentation. Also the riprap stone would provide in -water aquatic habitat along the toe of the <br />slope and upland small mammal habitat. <br />3.2 Fish and Aquatic Habitat: The St. Joseph River is about 250 feet wide in the project <br />vicinity. The river provides a variety of habitat for fish, benthos (bottom dwelling organisms), <br />and other aquatic macro -invertebrates. Existing aquatic habitat along the North Shore Drive <br />site includes areas of broken concrete bank protection interspersed with areas of overhanging <br />vegetation. While this may provide good aquatic habitat, much of it is being eroded. The trees <br />overhanging the river provide good fish cover, but eventually will be undermined and lost. <br />3.3 The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service noted the following fish species occur in this part of the <br />St. Joseph River: steelhead trout, coho and chinook salmon, smallmouth bass, bluegill, walleye, <br />shorthead and golden redhorse, pumpkinseed and green sunfish, carp, golden, spottail and <br />spotfin shiner, spotted, white and northern hog sucker, quillback carpsucker, logperch, and <br />longnose gar (correspondence, February 24, 2000, Attachment B, Page B-1). Steelhead are the <br />major anadromous fist: species that pass through the project area from Lake Michigan. <br />Freshwater mussels may be present, although there are no known mussel beds in the project <br />area. Numerous other aquatic invertebrates likely are present. <br />3.4 Construction of the riprap riverbank protection at all three sites would destroy existing <br />river bottom habitat within the construction area, but would provide a more stable habitat of <br />riprap stone. The in -water part of the riprap would be colonized by macro -invertebrates from <br />adjacent areas of the river, would provide feeding and/or spawning habitat for fish, and may <br />also attract birds which would feed on fish attracted to the area. Fish and other mobile <br />organisms would avoid the areas during construction. Vegetation overhanging the river would <br />be lost during construction, rather than to erosion. To prevent disruption of the spring fish <br />spawning, the construction contractor would be required to avoid turbidity generating activities <br />during the spring spawning run. <br />3.5 Wildlife Habitat: The three sites provide habitat for wildlife species typically found in <br />urban environments ---small mammals such as squirrel, rabbit, muskrat, etc. as well as a variety <br />of songbirds and ducks, and Canada geese. Leeper Park Island is mainly mowed lawn with <br />scattered trees, predominantly eastern cottonwood. At the North Shore Drive and CSO sites, <br />habitat mainly consists of steep, vegetated banks, with many mature trees. Predominant trees <br />along these riverbanks are maple, elm, sycamore, and cottonwood. <br />3.6 No trees would be removed from the Leeper Park site. All trees within the area to be <br />protected with riprap at both the CSO and North Shore sites would be removed. Many of these <br />trees, if not removed, ultimately would succumb to erosion. Approximately 2 large trees <br />(6 -inch or greater diameter at breast height) at the CSO site and 25 large trees (four ofwhich <br />are dead) ai the Nortin Shore Drive site wouiu be renwved. i he riprap slope woulu proviue <br />habitat for small mammals. Within the bio -engineered erosion control turf mat.protection, <br />along the upper bank at the North Shore Drive site, all large trees would remain. After <br />-6- <br />